Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Properties of healthcare teaming networks as a function of network construction algorithms.

Martin S Zand, Melissa Trayhan, Samir A Farooq, Christopher Fucile, Gourab Ghoshal, Robert J White, Caroline M Quill, Alexander Rosenberg, Hugo Serrano Barbosa, Kristen Bush and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using graph theory to flexibly construct patient journeys in linked healthcare data.International journal of population data science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martin S ZandRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-8682
Melissa TrayhanRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Samir A FarooqRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Christopher FucileRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Gourab GhoshalDepartment of Physics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Robert J WhiteRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Caroline M QuillRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Alexander RosenbergRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Hugo Serrano BarbosaDepartment of Physics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Kristen BushRochester Center for Health Informatics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Hassan ChafiOracle Labs, Belmont, CA, United States of America.
Timothy BoudreauOracle Labs, Belmont, CA, United States of America.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000042 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$14.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001999 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI XIAO, JIN · 2016 to 2024
$5.2M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002000 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI THAKAR, JUILEE, VAN WIJNGAARDEN, EDWIN · 2016 to 2024
$4.1M
Modeling B Cell Vaccine Responses in Transplant RecipientsR01AI069351 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HYRIEN, OLLIVIER, ZAND, MARTIN S · 2007 to 2016
$3.7M
Modeling Immune Desensitization in Renal TransplantationR01AI098112 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ZAND, MARTIN S · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
The University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$930k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001999NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000096NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002000NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000042NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069351NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network models of healthcare systems can be used to examine how providers collaborate, communicate, refer patients to each other, and to map how patients traverse the network of providers. Most healthcare service network models have been constructed from patient claims data, using billing claims to link a patient with a specific provider in time. The data sets can be quite large (106-108 individual claims per year), making standard methods for network construction computationally challenging and thus requiring the use of alternate construction algorithms. While these alternate methods have seen increasing use in generating healthcare networks, there is little to no literature comparing the differences in the structural properties of the generated networks, which as we demonstrate, can be dramatically different. To address this issue, we compared the properties of healthcare networks constructed using different algorithms from 2013 Medicare Part B outpatient claims data. Three different algorithms were compared: binning, sliding frame, and trace-route. Unipartite networks linking either providers or healthcare organizations by shared patients were built using each method. We find that each algorithm produced networks with substantially different topological properties, as reflected by numbers of edges, network density, assortativity, clustering coefficients and other structural measures. Provider networks adhered to a power law, while organization networks were best fit by a power law with exponential cutoff. Censoring networks to exclude edges with less than 11 shared patients, a common de-identification practice for healthcare network data, markedly reduced edge numbers and network density, and greatly altered measures of vertex prominence such as the betweenness centrality. Data analysis identified patterns in the distance patients travel between network providers, and a striking set of teaming relationships between providers in the Northeast United States and Florida, likely due to seasonal residence patterns of Medicare beneficiaries. We conclude that the choice of network construction algorithm is critical for healthcare network analysis, and discuss the implications of our findings for selecting the algorithm best suited to the type of analysis to be performed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, OrganizationalPatient Care TeamInterprofessional RelationsMedicare Part BUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28426795
PMCPMC5398561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.