Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Effects of dietary beef, pork, chicken and salmon on intestinal carcinogenesis in A/J Min/+ mice.

Christina Steppeler, Marianne Sødring, Bjørg Egelandsdal, Bente Kirkhus, Marije Oostindjer, Ole Alvseike, Lars Erik Gangsei, Ellen-Margrethe Hovland, Fabrice Pierre, Jan Erik Paulsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina SteppelerDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-2487
Marianne SødringDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørg EgelandsdalDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Bente KirkhusNofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Ås, Norway.
Marije OostindjerDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Ole AlvseikeAnimalia-Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Erik GangseiAnimalia-Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen-Margrethe HovlandAnimalia-Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo, Norway.
Fabrice PierreINRA UMR1331 Toxalim (Research Center in Food Toxicology), University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Jan Erik PaulsenDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
NORCE Research AS · NONorwegian Food Safety Authority · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NONofima · NOToxicologie Alimentaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified red meat as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A). In mechanistic studies exploring the link between intake of red meat and CRC, heme iron, the pigment of red meat, is proposed to play a central role as a catalyzer of luminal lipid peroxidation and cytotoxicity. In the present work, the novel A/J Min/+ mouse was used to investigate the effects of dietary beef, pork, chicken, or salmon (40% muscle food (dry weight) and 60% powder diet) on Apc-driven intestinal carcinogenesis, from week 3-13 of age. Muscle food diets did not differentially affect carcinogenesis in the colon (flat ACF and tumors). In the small intestine, salmon intake resulted in a lower tumor size and load than did meat from terrestrial animals (beef, pork or chicken), while no differences were observed between the effects of white meat (chicken) and red meat (pork and beef). Additional results indicated that intestinal carcinogenesis was not related to dietary n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, intestinal formation of lipid peroxidation products (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS), or cytotoxic effects of fecal water on Apc-/+ cells. Notably, the amount of heme reaching the colon appeared to be relatively low in this study. The greatest tumor load was induced by the reference diet RM1, underlining the importance of the basic diets in experimental CRC. The present study in A/J Min/+ mice does not support the hypothesis of a role of red meat in intestinal carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisMeat ProductsPoultry ProductsSeafoodAnimalsCattleChickensColorectal NeoplasmsFecesHemeMicePrincipal Component AnalysisSalmonSwineHeme

Identifiers

PMID28426718
PMCPMC5398569
OpenAlexW2605998812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.