Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426683›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Genome-wide identification and characterization of miRNAome from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) roots and root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) during susceptible interaction.

Pritam Kaur, Neha Shukla, Gopal Joshi, Cheeni VijayaKumar, Arun Jagannath, Manu Agarwal, Shailendra Goel, Amar Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. miRNA-Mediated Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. MicroRNA gatekeepers: Orchestrating rhizospheric dynamics.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Tomato MicroRNAs and Their Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Chitin Biosynthesis Inhibition ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Signal Transduction in Plant⁻Nematode Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pritam KaurDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Neha ShuklaDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Gopal JoshiDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Cheeni VijayaKumarDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Arun JagannathDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Manu AgarwalDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Shailendra GoelDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Amar KumarDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-9837
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs, Meloidogyne spp.) are the most damaging plant parasites causing severe losses to crop production. The present study reports genome-wide identification and characterization of both tomato and RKN miRNAs simultaneously from RKN-infected susceptible tomato roots using high-throughput sequencing technique. RNAseq data from 11 small RNA libraries derived from 5 disease development stages identified 281 novel miRNAs of tomato in addition to 52 conserved and 4 variants of conserved miRNAs. Additionally, the same set of RNAseq data identified 38 conserved and 290 novel RKN miRNAs. Both tomato and RKN miRNAs showed differential expression at 5 stages of disease development based on digital expression profiles. In tomato, further validation through qRT-PCR confirmed that majority of miRNAs were significantly upregulated during susceptible response whereas downregulated during resistance response. The predicted targets of 8 conserved and 1 novel miRNAs were validated through 5'RLM-RACE. A negative correlation between expression profiles of a few conserved miRNAs (miR156, miR159, miR164 and miR396) and their targets (SBP, GAMYB-like, NAC and GRF1 transcription factor) was confirmed. A novel Sly_miRNA996 also showed a negative correlation with its target MYB-like transcription factor. These results indicate that the conserved and novel tomato miRNAs are involved in regulating developmental changes in host root during RKN infection. In RKN, the targets of conserved miRNAs were also predicted and a few of their predicted target genes are known to be involved in nematode parasitism. Further, the potential roles of both tomato and RKN miRNAs have been discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsMicroRNAsPlant RootsSolanum lycopersicumTylenchoideaMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID28426683
PMCPMC5398497
OpenAlexW2606204707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.