Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426476›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2018

Autologous Myoblasts for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-controlled Study (MIAS).

Olivier Boyer, Valérie Bridoux, Camille Giverne, Aurélie Bisson, Edith Koning, Anne-Marie Leroi, Pascal Chambon, Justine Déhayes, Stephanie Le Corre, Serge Jacquot and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Progress on cell therapy for skeletal muscle disorders.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Controversies in fecal incontinence.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Stromal cell derived factor 1 plasmid to regenerate the anal sphincters.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. What Is Fecal Incontinence That Urologists Need to Know?International neurourology journal · 2021
    Article
  17. Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivier BoyerNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1234, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Valérie BridouxRouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France.
Camille GiverneNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1234, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Aurélie BissonNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1234, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Edith KoningRouen University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Rouen, France.
Anne-Marie LeroiRouen University Hospital, Department of Physiology, Rouen, France.
Pascal ChambonRouen University Hospital, Laboratory of Cytogenetics, Rouen, France.
Justine DéhayesRouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Stephanie Le CorreRouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Serge JacquotNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1234, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Dominique BastitEtablissement Français du Sang, Cell Therapy Unit, Bois Guillaume, France.
Jérémie MartinetNormandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1234, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Rouen, France.
Estelle HouivetRouen University Hospital, Department of Biostatistics, Rouen, France.
Jean-Jacques TuechRouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France.
Jacques BenichouRouen University Hospital, Department of Biostatistics, Rouen, France.
Francis MichotRouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France.
the Study Group of Myoblast Therapy for Faecal Incontinence
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRDigestive Care (United States) · USInstitute for Biomedicine · ITÉtablissement Français du Sang · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrasphincteric injections of autologous myoblasts (AMs) in fecal incontinence (FI) in a controlled study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adult stem cell therapy is expected to definitively cure FI by regenerating damaged sphincter. Preclinical data and results of open-label trials suggest that myoblast therapy may represent a noninvasive treatment option.

methodsWe conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intrasphincteric injections of AM in 24 patients. The study compared outcome after AM (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) injection using Cleveland Clinic Incontinence (CCI), score at 6 and 12 months. Patients in the placebo group were eligible to receive frozen AM after 1 year.

resultsAt 6 months, the median CCI score significantly decreased from baseline in both the AM (9 vs 15, P = 0.02) and placebo (10 vs 15, P = 0.01) groups. Hence, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (primary endpoint) at 6 months. At 12 months, the median CCI score continued to ameliorate in the AM group (6.5 vs 15, P = 0.006), while effect was lost in the placebo group (14 vs 15, P = 0.35). Consequently, there was a higher response rate at 12 months in the treated than the placebo arm (58% vs 8%, P = 0.03). After delayed frozen AM injection in the placebo group, the response rate was 60% (6/10) at 12 months.

conclusionsIntrasphincteric AM injections in FI patients have shown tolerance, safety, and clinical benefit at 12 months despite a transient placebo effect at 6 months.

Indexed as

AdultDouble-Blind MethodFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansInjectionsMiddle AgedMyoblastsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28426476
PMCPMC5805121
OpenAlexW2605432478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.