ArticleCritical care medicine2017
Physician Variation in Time to Antimicrobial Treatment for Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing of antibiotic initiation in sepsis and neutropenic fever.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Presenting Symptoms and Antibiotic Timing Among Hospitalized Adults With Presumed Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Performance of a novel medical artificial intelligence large language model on supporting decision-making for emergency patients with suspected sepsis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Sepsis Stewardship: The Puzzle of Antibiotic Therapy in the Context of Individualization of Decision Making.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- A comprehensive analysis of immune features and construction of an immune gene diagnostic model for sepsis.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Antimicrobials in Sepsis: Time to Pay Attention toAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremic patients in Southern Brazil.PloS one · 2023Article
- Co-expression and interaction network analysis reveals dysregulated neutrophil and T-cell activation as the core mechanism associated with septic shock.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- [Management of critically ill nontrauma patients in a nonuniversity emergency department].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2022Article
- Ground truth labels challenge the validity of sepsis consensus definitions in critical illness.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Factors Affecting the Time to First Dose Antibiotic in Sepsis in Acute Emergency.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Endothelial Dysfunction and Neutrophil Degranulation as Central Events in Sepsis Physiopathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Hydroxychloroquine versus Azithromycin for Hospitalized Patients with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 (HAHPS). Protocol for a Pragmatic, Open-Label, Active Comparator Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDelayed initiation of appropriate antimicrobials is linked to higher sepsis mortality. We investigated interphysician variation in septic patients' door-to-antimicrobial time.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingEmergency department of an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Adult patients treated with antimicrobials in the emergency department between 2009 and 2015 for fluid-refractory severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients who were transferred, received antimicrobials prior to emergency department arrival, or were treated by an attending physician who cared for less than five study patients were excluded.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe employed multivariable linear regression to evaluate the association between treating attending physician and door-to-antimicrobial time after adjustment for illness severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score), patient age, prehospital or arrival hypotension, admission from a long-term care facility, mode of arrival, weekend or nighttime admission, source of infection, and trainee involvement in care. Among 421 eligible patients, 74% received antimicrobials within 3 hours of emergency department arrival. After covariate adjustment, attending physicians' (n = 40) median door-to-antimicrobial times varied significantly, ranging from 71 to 359 minutes (p = 0.002). The percentage of each physician's patients whose antimicrobials began within 3 hours of emergency department arrival ranged from 0% to 100%. Overall, 12% of variability in antimicrobial timing was explained by the attending physician compared with 4% attributable to illness severity as measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (p < 0.001). Some but not all physicians started antimicrobials later for patients who were normotensive on presentation (p = 0.017) or who had a source of infection other than pneumonia (p = 0.006). The adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality increased by 20% for each 1 hour increase in door-to-antimicrobial time (p = 0.046).
conclusionsAmong patients with severe sepsis or septic shock receiving antimicrobials in the emergency department, door-to-antimicrobial times varied five-fold among treating physicians. Given the association between antimicrobial delay and mortality, interventions to reduce physician variation in antimicrobial initiation are likely indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.