Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426371›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2017

John T Martin, Sarah E Gullbrand, Bhavana Mohanraj, Beth G Ashinsky, Dong Hwa Kim, Kensuke Ikuta, Dawn M Elliott, Lachlan J Smith, Robert L Mauck, Harvey E Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John T Martin1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sarah E Gullbrand1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bhavana Mohanraj1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Beth G Ashinsky1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dong Hwa Kim1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kensuke Ikuta1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dawn M Elliott5 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware , Newark, Delaware.
Lachlan J Smith1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert L Mauck1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Harvey E Smith1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
The Role of Hyaluronic Acid Receptors in Tendon HealingP30AR050950 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALDWIN, DONALD A · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Tissue-Engineered Constructs for Treatment of Intervertebral Disc DegenerationIK2RX001476 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, HARVEY E. · 2015 to 2020
–
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR050950NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619RRD VA IK2 RX001476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of engineered tissues has progressed over the past 20 years from in vitro characterization to in vivo implementation. For musculoskeletal tissue engineering in particular, the emphasis of many of these studies was to select conditions that maximized functional and compositional gains in vitro. However, the transition from the favorable in vitro culture environment to a less favorable in vivo environment has proven difficult, and, in many cases, engineered tissues do not retain their preimplantation phenotype after even short periods in vivo. Our laboratory recently developed disc-like angle-ply structures (DAPS), an engineered intervertebral disc for total disc replacement. In this study, we tested six different preculture media formulations (three serum-containing and three chemically defined, with varying doses of transforming growth factor β3 [TGF-β3] and varying strategies to introduce serum) for their ability to preserve DAPS composition and metabolic activity during the transition from in vitro culture to in vivo implantation in a subcutaneous athymic rat model. We assayed implants before and after implantation to determine collagen content, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, metabolic activity, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. A chemically defined media condition that incorporated TGF-β3 promoted the deposition of GAG and collagen in DAPS in vitro, the maintenance of accumulated matrix in vivo, and minimal changes in the metabolic activity of cells within the construct. Preculture in serum-containing media (with or without TGF-β3) was not compatible with DAPS maturation, particularly in the nucleus pulposus (NP) region. All groups showed increased collagen production after implantation. These findings define a favorable preculture strategy for the translation of engineered discs seeded with disc cells.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisIntervertebral DiscAnimalsCattleCell Culture TechniquesRatsRats, NudeTotal Disc ReplacementTransforming Growth Factor beta3Tgfb3 protein, ratTransforming Growth Factor beta3animal modelelectrospun scaffoldhydrogelintervertebral disctissue engineeringtransforming growth factor beta 3

Identifiers

PMID28426371
PMCPMC5610389
OpenAlexW2591777140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.