Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426351›Full record

ReviewFly2017

The absence of crossovers on chromosome 4 in Drosophila melanogaster: Imperfection or interesting exception?

Michaelyn A Hartmann, Jeff Sekelsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fly, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TheGenetics · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Loss ofGenetics · 2018
    Article
  13. Regulation of Crossover Frequency and Distribution during Meiotic Recombination.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaelyn A Hartmanna Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , North Carolina , USA.
Jeff Sekelskya Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , North Carolina , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-677X

Funding

Mechanisms of Meiotic and Mitotic RecombinationR35GM118127 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JEFF J. SEKELSKY · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster chromosome 4 is an anomaly because of its small size, chromatin structure, and most notably its lack of crossing over during meiosis. Earlier ideas about the absence of crossovers on 4 hypothesize that these unique characteristics function to prevent crossovers. Here, we explore hypotheses about the absence of crossovers on 4, how these have been addressed, and new insights into the mechanism behind this suppression. We review recently published results that indicate that global crossover patterning, in particular the centromere effect, make a major contribution to the prevention of crossovers on 4.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectAnimalsCrossing Over, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMeiosisDrosophila ProteinsBloom syndrome helicasechromosome 4crossover patterningmeiosisrecombination

Identifiers

PMID28426351
PMCPMC5721948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.