Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426287›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Pregnancy and the Acceptability of Computer-Based Versus Traditional Mental Health Treatments.

Liisa Hantsoo, Jessica Podcasy, Mary Sammel, Cynthia Neill Epperson, Deborah R Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technologies Applied to the Mental Health Care of Pregnant Women: A Systematic Literature Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liisa Hantsoo1 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jessica Podcasy1 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mary Sammel4 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia Neill Epperson1 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Deborah R Kim1 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Prepubertal Stress, Windows of Risk & Sex Bias for Affective DisturbanceP50MH099910 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, DEBORAH · 2012 to 2017
$6.5M
Psychophysiology, Neurosteroids, and Stress in Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD)K23MH107831 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HANTSOO, LIISA VICTORIA · 2016 to 2020
$905k
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pregnant Women with Depressive DisorderK23MH092399 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, DEBORAH · 2011 to 2015
$886k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH092399NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH107831NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH099910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent recommendations urge increased depression screening in pregnant and postpartum women, potentially increasing demand for treatment. Computer-based psychotherapy treatments may address some of perinatal women's unique mental health treatment needs and barriers. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a quantitative survey of pregnant women (≥12 weeks of gestation) on preferences regarding computer-based therapies compared with traditional therapies (psychotherapy and medication). Nonpregnant women and men served as comparison groups. Participants were provided descriptions of three computer-based therapies: video telehealth therapy (VTT), computer-assisted therapy (CAT), and self-guided online therapy (SGO). Participants were asked to select all options that they would consider for treatment as well as first choice preference. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) assessed current depressive symptomatology, and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) assessed psychiatric history.

resultsParticipants included pregnant females (n = 111), nonpregnant females (n = 147), and males (n = 54). Among pregnant women, 77.5% (n = 86) indicated that they would consider some form of computer-based therapy for mental health treatment during pregnancy; VTT was the most commonly considered, followed by CAT and SGO. When asked to select their preferred intervention, traditional talk therapy was the first choice among all three groups, controlling for treatment history and PHQ-9 score. About one-third of pregnant women chose some form of computer-based therapy as their top choice.

conclusionsWhile computer-based therapies were acceptable to most pregnant women in this sample, traditional talk therapy was the preferred option. Future research should consider how to tailor computer-based therapies to the unique needs of perinatal women.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPatient PreferencePsychotherapyTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Health QuestionnairePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsCCBTdepressioneHealthinternet-based treatmentperinatal

Identifiers

PMID28426287
PMCPMC5651968
OpenAlexW2608661503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.