Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426281›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2017

Identification of SSEA-1 expressing enhanced reprogramming (SEER) cells in porcine embryonic fibroblasts.

Dong Li, Jan O Secher, Morten Juhl, Kaveh Mashayekhi, Troels T Nielsen, Bjørn Holst, Poul Hyttel, Kristine K Freude, Vanessa J Hall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dong Lia Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.
Jan O Sechera Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.
Morten Juhlb Cardiology Stem Cell Centre , The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1138-9712
Kaveh Mashayekhia Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.
Troels T Nielsene Danish Dementia Research Centre , Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Bjørn Holstf Bioneer A/S , Hørsholm , Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-6881
Poul Hyttela Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.
Kristine K Freudea Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.
Vanessa J Halla Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences , Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-2214
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKBioneer (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that a subpopulation of cells within cultured human dermal fibroblasts, termed multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, are preferentially reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells. However, controversy exists over whether these cells are the only cells capable of being reprogrammed from a heterogeneous population of fibroblasts. Similarly, there is little research to suggest such cells may exist in embryonic tissues or other species. To address if such a cell population exists in pigs, we investigated porcine embryonic fibroblast populations (pEFs) and identified heterogeneous expression of several key cell surface markers. Strikingly, we discovered a small population of stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 positive cells (SSEA-1+) in Danish Landrace and Göttingen minipig pEFs, which were absent in the Yucatan pEFs. Furthermore, reprogramming of SSEA-1+ sorted pEFs led to higher reprogramming efficiency. Subsequent transcriptome profiling of the SSEA-1+ vs. the SSEA-1neg cell fraction revealed highly comparable gene signatures. However several genes that were found to be upregulated in the SSEA-1+ cells were similarly expressed in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We therefore termed these cells SSEA-1 Expressing Enhanced Reprogramming (SEER) cells. Interestingly, SEER cells were more effective at differentiating into osteocytes and chondrocytes in vitro. We conclude that SEER cells are more amenable for reprogramming and that the expression of mesenchymal stem cell genes is advantageous in the reprogramming process. This data provides evidence supporting the elite theory and helps to delineate which cell types and specific genes are important for reprogramming in the pig.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsBiomarkersBreedingCell DifferentiationCell MembraneCells, CulturedEmbryo, MammalianEndoglinFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceStage-Specific Embryonic AntigensSus scrofaBiomarkersEndoglinStage-Specific Embryonic Antigensfibroblastinduced pluripotent stem cellporcinereprogrammingSSEA-1

Identifiers

PMID28426281
PMCPMC5499827
OpenAlexW2605902307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.