Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28425777›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2017

Self-reported dependence on mobile phones in young adults: A European cross-cultural empirical survey.

Olatz Lopez-Fernandez, Daria J Kuss, Lucia Romo, Yannick Morvan, Laurence Kern, Pierluigi Graziani, Amélie Rousseau, Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Anja Bischof, Ann-Kathrin Gässler and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
80.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Assessing mobile phone attachment: a psychometric study in the Portuguese young adult population.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 11 countries.

Olatz Lopez-Fernandez1 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham, UK.
Daria J Kuss1 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham, UK.
Lucia Romo3 CLIPSYD Lab, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense , Nanterre, France.
Yannick Morvan3 CLIPSYD Lab, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense , Nanterre, France.
Laurence Kern4 CLIPSYD Lab, UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense , Nanterre, France.
Pierluigi Graziani5 LPS EA 849, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille, France.
Amélie Rousseau7 Psychology Department, PSITEC EA 4074, Université Lille Nord de France , Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf8 Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lüebeck , Lüebeck, Germany.
Anja Bischof8 Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lüebeck , Lüebeck, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin Gässler8 Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lüebeck , Lüebeck, Germany.
Adriano Schimmenti9 Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, UKE - Kore University of Enna , Enna, Italy.
Alessia Passanisi9 Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, UKE - Kore University of Enna , Enna, Italy.
Niko Männikkö10 RDI Services, Oulu University of Applied Sciences , Oulu, Finland.
Maria Kääriänen11 Department of Nursing - Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital , Oulu, Finland.
Zsolt Demetrovics12 Department of Clinical Psychology and Addiction, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya Király12 Department of Clinical Psychology and Addiction, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
Mariano Chóliz13 Department of Basic Psychology, University of Valencia , Valencia, Spain.
Juan José Zacarés14 Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia , Valencia, Spain.
Emilia Serra14 Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia , Valencia, Spain.
Mark D Griffiths1 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham, UK.
Halley M Pontes1 International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham, UK.
Bernadeta Lelonek-Kuleta15 Department of Family Science and Social Work, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II , Lublin, Poland.
Joanna Chwaszcz16 Department of Psychology, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II , Lublin, Poland.
Daniele Zullino17 Department of Psychiatry - Research Unit Addictive Disorders, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland.
Lucien Rochat19 Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland.
Sophia Achab17 Department of Psychiatry - Research Unit Addictive Disorders, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland.
Joël Billieux2 Laboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain , Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Nottingham Trent University · GBUniversitat de València · ESUniversité Paris Nanterre · FRUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lübeck · DEEötvös Loránd University · HUJohn Paul II Catholic University of Lublin · PLUCLouvain · BEUniversità degli Studi di Enna Kore · ITAix-Marseille Université · FROulu University of Applied Sciences · FIUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims Despite many positive benefits, mobile phone use can be associated with harmful and detrimental behaviors. The aim of this study was twofold: to examine (a) cross-cultural patterns of perceived dependence on mobile phones in ten European countries, first, grouped in four different regions (North: Finland and UK; South: Spain and Italy; East: Hungary and Poland; West: France, Belgium, Germany, and Switzerland), and second by country, and (b) how socio-demographics, geographic differences, mobile phone usage patterns, and associated activities predicted this perceived dependence. Methods A sample of 2,775 young adults (aged 18-29 years) were recruited in different European Universities who participated in an online survey. Measures included socio-demographic variables, patterns of mobile phone use, and the dependence subscale of a short version of the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Questionnaire (PMPUQ; Billieux, Van der Linden, & Rochat, 2008). Results The young adults from the Northern and Southern regions reported the heaviest use of mobile phones, whereas perceived dependence was less prevalent in the Eastern region. However, the proportion of highly dependent mobile phone users was more elevated in Belgium, UK, and France. Regression analysis identified several risk factors for increased scores on the PMPUQ dependence subscale, namely using mobile phones daily, being female, engaging in social networking, playing video games, shopping and viewing TV shows through the Internet, chatting and messaging, and using mobile phones for downloading-related activities. Discussion and conclusions Self-reported dependence on mobile phone use is influenced by frequency and specific application usage.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdolescentAdultBehavior, AddictiveCross-Cultural ComparisonEuropeHumansInternetPrevalenceRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSelf ReportUniversitiesYoung Adultbehavioral addictionscross-cultural researchmobile phone dependenceproblematic mobile phone useyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28425777
PMCPMC5520117
OpenAlexW2605749566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.