Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28425587›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2017

Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.

Boyce E Griffith, Xiaoyu Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A model of fluid-structure and biochemical interactions for applications to subclinical leaflet thrombosis.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  15. A Nodal Immersed Finite Element-Finite Difference Method.Journal of computational physics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Boyce E GriffithDepartments of Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, Carolina Center for Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, and McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-7504
Xiaoyu LuoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-4210

Funding

Mathematical modeling and computer simulation of aortic dissectionR01HL117063 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GRIFFITH, BOYCE EUGENE · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immersed boundary method is an approach to fluid-structure interaction that uses a Lagrangian description of the structural deformations, stresses, and forces along with an Eulerian description of the momentum, viscosity, and incompressibility of the fluid-structure system. The original immersed boundary methods described immersed elastic structures using systems of flexible fibers, and even now, most immersed boundary methods still require Lagrangian meshes that are finer than the Eulerian grid. This work introduces a coupling scheme for the immersed boundary method to link the Lagrangian and Eulerian variables that facilitates independent spatial discretizations for the structure and background grid. This approach uses a finite element discretization of the structure while retaining a finite difference scheme for the Eulerian variables. We apply this method to benchmark problems involving elastic, rigid, and actively contracting structures, including an idealized model of the left ventricle of the heart. Our tests include cases in which, for a fixed Eulerian grid spacing, coarser Lagrangian structural meshes yield discretization errors that are as much as several orders of magnitude smaller than errors obtained using finer structural meshes. The Lagrangian-Eulerian coupling approach developed in this work enables the effective use of these coarse structural meshes with the immersed boundary method. This work also contrasts two different weak forms of the equations, one of which is demonstrated to be more effective for the coarse structural discretizations facilitated by our coupling approach.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisModels, CardiovascularHeart VentriclesHumansfinite difference methodfinite element methodfluid-structure interactionimmersed boundary methodincompressible elasticityincompressible flow

Identifiers

PMID28425587
PMCPMC5650596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.