Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28425064›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2017

A Pathway to Personalizing Therapy for Metastases Using Liver-on-a-Chip Platforms.

A S Khazali, A M Clark, A Wells

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microphysiological systems as models for immunologically 'cold' tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S KhazaliDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
A M ClarkDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
A WellsDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, S711 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. wellsa@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-8150
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Probing the Role of the Tumor Microenvironment on Mechanistic Biomarkers for Chemotherapeutic ResistanceUH3TR000496 · NCATS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFITH, LINDA G · 2014 to 2016
$3.5M
Molecular Regulation of Breast Cancer ProgressionI01BX003368 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2016 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003368NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis accounts for most cancer-related deaths. The majority of solid cancers, including those of the breast, colorectum, prostate and skin, metastasize at significant levels to the liver due to its hemodynamic as well as tumor permissive microenvironmental properties. As this occurs prior to detection and treatment of the primary tumor, we need to target liver metastases to improve patients' outcomes. Animal models, while proven to be useful in mechanistic studies, do not represent the heterogeneity of human population especially in drug metabolism lack proper human cell-cell interactions, and this gap between animals and humans results in costly and inefficient drug discovery. This underscores the need to accurately model the human liver for disease studies and drug development. Further, the occurrence of liver metastases is influenced by the primary tumor type, sex and race; thus, modeling these specific settings will facilitate the development of personalized/targeted medicine for each specific group. We have adapted such all-human 3D ex vivo hepatic microphysiological system (MPS) (a.k.a. liver-on-a-chip) to investigate human micrometastases. This review focuses on the sources of liver resident cells, especially the iPS cell-derived hepatocytes, and examines some of the advantages and disadvantages of these sources. In addition, this review also examines other potential challenges and limitations in modeling human liver.

Indexed as

HepatocytesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesLiverLiver NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrecision Medicine3D ex vivo hepatic microphysiological system (MPS)Embryonic stem cells (ES cells)HepatocytesInduced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells)Liver metastasisLiver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSE cells)Non-parenchymal cells (NPC)Personalized/precision medicine

Identifiers

PMID28425064
PMCPMC5484059
OpenAlexW2605676872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.