Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424953›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2017

Treatment Update of Chronic Migraine.

Soo-Jin Cho, Tae-Jin Song, Min Kyung Chu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Animal Models of Chronic Migraine: From the Bench to Therapy.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ubrogepant to Treat Acute Migraine in Adults.Neurology international · 2021
    Review
  10. Chronic Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: A Review of Current Perspectives.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Soo-Jin ChoDepartment of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 445-907, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Jin SongDepartment of Neurology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 158-710, Republic of Korea.
Min Kyung ChuDepartment of Neurology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1 Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, Republic of Korea. chumk@hallym.ac.kr.
Ewha Womans University Medical Center · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAlthough chronic migraine (CM) is a common disorder that severely impacts patient functioning and quality of life, it is usually underdiagnosed, and treatment responses often remain poor even after diagnosis. In addition, effective treatment options are limited due to the rarity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with CM. In the present review, we discuss updated pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and neurostimulation treatment options for CM. RECENT

findingsPharmacological treatments include both acute and preventive measures. While acute treatment options are similar between CM and episodic migraine (EM), preventive treatment with topiramate and botulinum toxin A exhibited efficacy in more than two RCTs. In addition, several studies have revealed that behavioral interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, biofeedback, and relaxation techniques are associated with significant improvements in symptoms. Thus, these treatment options are recommended for patients with CM, especially for refractory cases. Neurostimulation procedures, such as occipital stimulation, supraorbital transcutaneous stimulation, non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation, have shown promising results in the treatment of CM. However, current studies on neurostimulation suffer from small sample size, no replication, or negative results. Although CM is less responsive to treatment compared to EM, recent advance in pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and neurostimulation treatments may provide more chance for successful treatment of CM.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyElectric Stimulation TherapyFructoseHumansMigraine DisordersNeuroprotective AgentsQuality of LifeRelaxation TherapyTopiramateTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerve StimulationBotulinum Toxins, Type AFructoseNeuroprotective AgentsTopiramateBehavioral treatmentChronic daily headacheChronic migraineHeadacheMigrainePharmacological treatment

Identifiers

PMID28424953
OpenAlexW2605765539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.