Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424870›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2017

High intensity interval training does not impair strength gains in response to resistance training in premenopausal women.

Paulo Gentil, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, Suedi Gonçalves Cardoso Filho, Cauê Vazquez La Scala Teixeira, James Steele, James Fisher, Juliana Alves Carneiro, Mário Hebling Campos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulo GentilLaboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano/FEFD, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goias, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, CEP: 74.690-900, Brazil. paulogentil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2459-4977
Claudio Andre Barbosa de LiraLaboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano/FEFD, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goias, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, CEP: 74.690-900, Brazil.
Suedi Gonçalves Cardoso FilhoLaboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano/FEFD, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goias, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, CEP: 74.690-900, Brazil.
Cauê Vazquez La Scala TeixeiraUniversidade de São Paulo/Campus Baixada Santista, Santos, Brazil.
James SteeleSport Science Laboratory, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK.
James FisherSport Science Laboratory, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK.
Juliana Alves CarneiroLaboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano/FEFD, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goias, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, CEP: 74.690-900, Brazil.
Mário Hebling CamposLaboratório de Avaliação do Movimento Humano/FEFD, Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goias, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, CEP: 74.690-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the increases in upper- and lower-body muscle strength in premenopausal women performing resistance training (RT) alone or alongside concurrent high-intensity interval training (CT).

methodsSixteen women (26-40 years) were randomly assigned into two groups that performed either RT or CT. Both groups performed the same RT program; however, CT performed additional high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on a bicycle ergometer before RT. The study lasted 8 weeks and the participants were tested for ten repetition maximum (10RM) load in elbow flexion (barbell biceps curl) and knee extension exercises pre- and post-intervention. RT was performed with 10-12 repetitions to self-determined repetition maximum in the first four weeks and then progressed to 8-10. During CT, HIIT was performed before RT with six 1-min bouts at 7-8 of perceived subjective exertion (RPE) and then progressed to eight bouts at 9-10 RPE.

resultsAnalysis of variance revealed significant increases in upper and lower body strength for both the RT and CT groups. Biceps barbell curl 10RM load increased from 12.9 ± 3.2 kg to 14 ± 1.5 kg in CT (p < 0.05) and from 13 ± 1.8 kg to 15.9 ± 2.5 kg in RT (p < 0.05), with no significant between-groups differences. Knee extension 10RM increase from 31.9 ± 11.6 kg to 37.5 ± 8.5 kg for CT (p < 0.05) and from 30.6 ± 8.6 kg to 41.2 ± 7.4 kg for RT (p < 0.05).

conclusionIn conclusion, performing HIIT on a cycle ergometer before resistance training does not seem to impair muscle strength increases in the knee extensors or elbow flexors of pre-menopausal women. This information should be considered when prescribing exercise sessions, since both activities may be combined without negative effects in muscle strength.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthAdultFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMuscle, SkeletalPremenopauseResistance TrainingAerobic trainingIntermittent trainingMuscle fitnessResistance exerciseStrength training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.