ReviewDer Anaesthesist2017
[Future of emergency medicine in Germany 2.0].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of non-invasive ventilation before prehospital emergency anesthesia in trauma - a cohort analysis with machine learning.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of the diagnostic concordance of tele-EMS and EMS physicians in the emergency medical service-a subanalysis of the TEMS-trial.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- What do community paramedics in Germany do regarding the care of older people? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of low-acuity cases.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Optimising co-design processes in telemedicine innovation-developing a telemedical solution for emergency medical services.PloS one · 2024Article
- [Update tele-emergency medicine : Status quo and perspectives].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- [Emergency physician training-survey of course participants regarding training conditions and motivation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Article
- [Quo vadis emergency medical service? A thought-provoking assignment…].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Article
- [Restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment : What will change?]Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Training in clinical acute and emergency medicine - Supraspeciality in Germany : A concept for nationwide implementation!]Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
- [Development of ground-based physician-staffed emergency missions in the city of Leipzig from 2003 to 2013].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Preclinical emergency medicine-thinking outside the box is worth it!]Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Reform of emergency physician training in Austria : Finally up to date?]Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
- Developing telemedicine in Emergency Medical Services: A low-cost solution and practical approach connecting interfaces in emergency medicine.The journal of medicine accessArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2003 an article on the future of prehospital emergency medicine in Germany was published in the journal Der Anaesthesist. Emergency medicine in Germany, which at that time was almost exclusively defined as prehospital emergency rescue, has evolved and now in-hospital domains have increasingly moved into the focus. At that time, the primary goal was to connect prehospital management with a smooth transition to hospital admission and further care in the hospital and to further optimize the rescue chain from the actual emergency through to causative treatment. Now after 15 years, the authors have critically assessed the development postulated in 2003 and reevaluated it. Which aspects could be developed further and become firmly established, what is still open and which questions in preclinical and clinical emergency treatment of the population will occupy us in the coming 15 years? With a critical eye to the past, the present contribution aims to capture the essential and new topics and open questions and provide a fresh perspective for the future of emergency medicine. Regulation at the state level or even lower levels of government often stand in contrast to more sweeping and economically effective approaches at the federal level. Prehospital emergency medicine in Germany is on the whole well-positioned with respect to facilities and personnel; however, as far as the economic situation and the utilization of available systems are concerned, there is still substantial room for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28424835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.