Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424543›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017

Patient perceptions of a comprehensive telemedicine intervention to address persistent poorly controlled diabetes.

Sara M Andrews, Nina R Sperber, Jennifer M Gierisch, Susanne Danus, Stephanie L Macy, Hayden B Bosworth, David Edelman, Matthew J Crowley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Current use of telehealth in urology: a review.World journal of urology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara M AndrewsCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Nina R SperberCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Jennifer M GierischCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Susanne DanusCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Stephanie L MacyCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Hayden B BosworthCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
David EdelmanCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Matthew J CrowleyCenter for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VN

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 13-261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe studied a telemedicine intervention for persistent poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (PPDM) that combined telemonitoring, self-management support, and medication management. The intervention was designed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Affairs (VA) telemedicine infrastructure. To refine the intervention and inform the delivery of the intervention in other settings, we examined participants' experiences.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 18 Veterans who completed the intervention. We analyzed interview text using directed content analysis and categorized themes by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) improvement (<1% or ≥1%).

resultsParticipants generally reported greater awareness of their blood glucose levels; however, they described dissatisfaction with the telemonitoring interface and competing demands during the intervention. Participants with <1% HbA1c improvement reported that these challenges interfered with their engagement. Participants with ≥1% HbA1c improvement reported new self-management routines despite challenges.

conclusionDespite competing demands and frustration with the telemonitoring interface, many participants demonstrated intervention engagement and substantial improvement in HbA1c ($1%). Differences in engagement may reflect differing capacity to manage treatment burden. Because it relies on existing infrastructure, this intervention is a promising model for addressing PPDM within VA. Future work should focus on optimizing systems' telemedicine infrastructure; while reliance on existing infrastructure may facilitate practical delivery, and it may also limit intervention engagement by excessively contributing to treatment burden.

Indexed as

patient perspectivespersistent poorly controlled diabetestelemedicinetreatment burdentype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28424543
PMCPMC5344448
OpenAlexW2593084004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.