Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

[

S Diocou, A Volpe, M Jauregui-Osoro, M Boudjemeline, K Chuamsaamarkkee, F Man, P J Blower, T Ng, G E D Mullen, G O Fruhwirth

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent developments in translational imaging of in vivo gene therapy outcomes.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Gene editing enables non-invasiveMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances in CAR T Cell Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S DiocouKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
A VolpeKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
M Jauregui-OsoroKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
M BoudjemelineKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
K ChuamsaamarkkeeKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
F ManKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-2180
P J BlowerKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
T NgKing's College London, The Richard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division of Molecular Biophysics and Cancer Division, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
G E D MullenKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK. greg.mullen@kcl.ac.uk.
G O FruhwirthKing's College London, Imaging Chemistry and Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK. gilbert.fruhwirth@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1438-2674
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 21153Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cell metastasis is responsible for most cancer deaths. Non-invasive in vivo cancer cell tracking in spontaneously metastasizing tumor models still poses a challenge requiring highest sensitivity and excellent contrast. The goal of this study was to evaluate if the recently introduced PET radiotracer [

Indexed as

AnimalsBoratesCell LineFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesHumansMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceNeoplasm MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRatsSodium-Iodide SymportersSymportersBoratesFluorine Radioisotopesfluoroboric acidRadiopharmaceuticalsSodium-Iodide SymportersSymporters

Identifiers

PMID28424464
PMCPMC5430436
OpenAlexW2605493187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.