ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2017
A survey of national and multi-national registries and cohort studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges and opportunities.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Registry at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (JIAR-KASCH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Breaking down the fences among registries on autoinflammatory diseases: the E-Merge project.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Article
- Implications of Evolving Disease Classification for Drug Approval in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Paediatric drugs · 2022Article
- Development of a Nationally Agreed Core Clinical Dataset for Childhood Onset Uveitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Children hospitalized for juvenile arthritis in the United States.Reumatologia · 2021Article
- Vaccinology Education of Nurses and the Current Immunoprophylaxis Recommendations for Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Parental Perspectives about Research and Knowledge Translation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.ACR open rheumatology · 2020Article
- Towards European harmonisation of healthcare for patients with rare immune disorders: outcome from the ERN RITA registries survey.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Methotrexate persistence and adverse drug reactions in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Risk of malignancy associated with paediatric use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo characterize the existing national and multi-national registries and cohort studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and identify differences as well as areas of potential future collaboration.
methodsWe surveyed investigators from North America, Europe, and Australia about existing JIA cohort studies and registries. We excluded cross-sectional studies. We captured information about study design, duration, location, inclusion criteria, data elements and collection methods.
resultsWe received survey results from 18 studies, including 11 national and 7 multi-national studies representing 37 countries in total. Study designs included inception cohorts, prevalent disease cohorts, and new treatment cohorts (several of which contribute to pharmacosurveillance activities). Despite numerous differences, the data elements collected across the studies was quite similar, with most studies collecting at least 5 of the 6 American College of Rheumatology core set variables and the data needed to calculate the 3-variable clinical juvenile disease activity score. Most studies were collecting medication initiation and discontinuation dates and were attempting to capture serious adverse events.
conclusionThere is a wide-range of large, ongoing JIA registries and cohort studies around the world. Our survey results indicate significant potential for future collaborative work using data from different studies and both combined and comparative analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.