Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424090›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017

Targeted endomyocardial biopsy guided by real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Christina Unterberg-Buchwald, Christian Oliver Ritter, Verena Reupke, Robin Niklas Wilke, Christine Stadelmann, Michael Steinmetz, Andreas Schuster, Gerd Hasenfuß, Joachim Lotz, Martin Uecker

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Thermally Drawn Polymeric Catheters for MR-Guided Cardiovascular Intervention.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A phantom for targeted endomyocardial biopsy training.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2023
    Article
  16. Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: state-of-the-art.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. [MRI-based catheter ablation : Current status and outlook].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Unterberg-BuchwaldUniversity Medical Center Goettingen, Clinic of Cardiology and Pneumology, Goettingen, Germany. unterberg@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-4398
Christian Oliver RitterDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Goettingen, Berlin, Germany.
Verena ReupkeDepartment of Experimental Animal Medicine, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
Robin Niklas WilkeDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Goettingen, Berlin, Germany.
Christine StadelmannDepartment of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Michael SteinmetzDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Goettingen, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas SchusterUniversity Medical Center Goettingen, Clinic of Cardiology and Pneumology, Goettingen, Germany.
Gerd HasenfußUniversity Medical Center Goettingen, Clinic of Cardiology and Pneumology, Goettingen, Germany.
Joachim LotzDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Goettingen, Berlin, Germany.
Martin UeckerDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Goettingen, Berlin, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DENephrologisches Zentrum Goettingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are an important diagnostic tool for myocarditis and other infiltrative cardiac diseases. Routinely, biopsies are obtained under fluoroscopic guidance with a substantial radiation burden. Despite procedural success, there is a large sampling error caused by missing the affected myocardium. Therefore, multiple (>6) biopsies are taken in the clinical setting. In cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) depicts areas of affected myocardium in myocarditis or in other infiltrative cardiomyopathies. Thus, targeted biopsy under real-time CMR image guidance might reduce the problem of sampling error.

methodsSeven minipigs of the Goettingen strain underwent radiofrequency ablation in the left ventricle. At least two focal lesions were induced on the lateral wall in five and the apex in two animals. Each ablation lesion was created by two consecutive 30 sec ablations (max. 30 W, temperature 60-64 °C). Biopsies were taken immediately after lesion induction using a commercially available 7 F conventional bioptome under fluoroscopic guidance at the ablation site. Afterwards the animals underwent CMR and lesion visualization by LGE at 3T. The lesions were then targeted and biopsied under CMR-guidance using a MR-conditional bioptome guided by a steerable catheter. Interactive real-time (RT) visualization of the intervention on an in-room monitor was based on radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction (NLINV) at a temporal resolution of 42 ms. All samples underwent a standard histological evaluation.

resultsRadiofrequency ablation was successful in all animals. Fluoroscopy-guided biopsies were performed with a success rate of 6/6 minipigs - resulting in a nonlethal pericardial effusion in one animal. Visualization of radiofrequency lesions by CMR was successful in 7/7 minipig, i.e. at least one lesion was clearly visible. Localization and tracking of the catheters and the bioptome using interactive control of the imaging plane was achieved in 6/6 MP; however in the animal with a large pericardial effusion after EMB under fluoroscopy no further EMB was attempted for safety reasons. Biopsies under interactive RT-CMR guidance were successfully performed in 5/6 animals, in one animal the bioptome reached the lesion, however the forceps did not cut out a sample. Specimens obtained under CMR guidance contained part of the lesion in 6/15 (40%) myocardial specimens and in 4/5 (80%) animals in which samples were achieved. Conventional biopsies revealed ablation lesions in 4/17 (23.5%) specimens in 3/6 minipigs (50%).

conclusionFocal lesions induced by radiofrequency ablation in a minipig model are a useful tool for CMR-guided biopsy studies. In contrast to fluoroscopy, CMR provides excellent visualization of lesions. Interactive real-time CMR allows excellent passive tracking of the instruments and EMB provides significantly superior sampling accuracy compared to fluoroscopy-guided biopsies. Nonetheless, further improvements of MR-compatible bioptomes and guiding catheters are essential before applying this method in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalAnimalsHeart VentriclesImage-Guided BiopsyMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsRadiography, InterventionalSwineSwine, MiniatureTime FactorsCMREndomyocardial biopsyReal-time MRITargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID28424090
PMCPMC5395773
OpenAlexW2606479517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.