Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424067›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2017

Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh.

Raquel Conde-Muíño, José-Luis Díez, Alberto Martínez, Francisco Huertas, Inmaculada Segura, Pablo Palma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Surgical strategies for recurrent parastomal hernia after a primary repair with a DynameshHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Permanent end-colostomy parastomal hernia prevention using a novel three-dimensional mesh.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raquel Conde-MuíñoDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
José-Luis DíezDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Alberto MartínezDepartment of Radiology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francisco HuertasDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Inmaculada SeguraDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Pablo PalmaDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain. pablopalma@andaluciajunta.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1084-5982
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParastomal hernia is a very common complication after stoma formation. Current surgical techniques for repairing parastomal hernia have unsatisfactory results. We aim to assess our preliminary experience with prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stoma formation.

methodsData were prospectively recorded. A specifically designed mesh made of polyvinyl fluoride with central conduit (Dynamesh IPST®) was fixed using an intra-peritoneal onlay technique. Safety was evaluated by means of surgical data and frequency of mesh-related complications, efficacy by the rate of parastomal hernias.

resultsThirty-four patients were included in the study. Three of them died before a year of follow up (not related to the stoma), so they were excluded. The other 31 patients (11 women and 20 men) were prospectively followed up after different pathologies resulting in a permanent colostomy. Twelve months after surgery CT-Scan imaging revealed two (6.4%) parastomal hernias, one of them already clinically suspected. During the follow up, 29% of the patients (n = 9) developed another type of hernia (incisional, inguinal or both). In five patients (16.1%) a light stomal retraction of the otherwise slightly prominent ostomy was observed. Median clinical follow-up was 17.5 months (range 12-34).

conclusionProphylactic parastomal mesh placement might be a safe and effective procedure with a potential to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia. Routine use of this technique should be further analysed.

Indexed as

PolyvinylsSurgical MeshAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesColostomyFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurgical StomasTomography, X-Ray Computedpolyvinyl fluoridePolyvinyls

Identifiers

PMID28424067
PMCPMC5395763
OpenAlexW2607484847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.