Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28424052›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study.

Mona J Ritchie, Louise E Parker, Carrie N Edlund, JoAnn E Kirchner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Intervention to Improve Psychosocial Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mona J RitchieDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Program for Team-Based Behavioral Health, 2200 Ft Roots Dr, Bdg 58, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA. Mona.Ritchie@va.gov.
Louise E ParkerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Program for Team-Based Behavioral Health, 2200 Ft Roots Dr, Bdg 58, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA.
Carrie N EdlundDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Program for Team-Based Behavioral Health, 2200 Ft Roots Dr, Bdg 58, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA.
JoAnn E KirchnerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Program for Team-Based Behavioral Health, 2200 Ft Roots Dr, Bdg 58, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA.
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated a facilitation strategy to help clinical sites likely to experience challenges implement evidence-based Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) care models within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiative. This article describes our assessment of whether implementation facilitation (IF) can foster development of high quality PC-MHI programs that adhere to evidence, are sustainable and likely to improve clinical practices and outcomes.

methodsUtilizing a matched pair design, we conducted a qualitative descriptive evaluation of the IF strategy in sixteen VA primary care clinics. To assess program quality and adherence to evidence, we conducted one-hour structured telephone interviews, at two time points, with clinicians and leaders who knew the most about the clinics' programs. We then created structured summaries of the interviews that VA national PC-MHI experts utilized to rate the programs on four dimensions (overall quality, adherence to evidence, sustainability and level of improvement).

resultsAt first assessment, seven of eight IF sites and four of eight comparison sites had implemented a PC-MHI program. Our qualitative assessment suggested that experts rated IF sites' programs higher than comparison sites' programs with one exception. At final assessment, all eight IF but only five comparison sites had implemented a PC-MHI program. Again, experts rated IF sites' programs higher than their matched comparison sites with one exception. Over time, all ratings improved in five of seven IF sites and two of three comparison sites.

conclusionsImplementing complex evidence-based programs, particularly in settings that lack infrastructure, resources and support for such efforts, is challenging. Findings suggest that a blend of external expert and internal regional facilitation strategies that implementation scientists have developed and tested can improve PC-MHI program uptake, quality and adherence to evidence in primary care clinics with these challenges. However, not all sites showed these improvements. To be successful, facilitators likely need at least a moderate level of leaders' support, including provision of basic resources. Additionally, we found that IF and strength of leadership structure may have a synergistic effect on ability to implement higher quality and evidence-based programs.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeGuideline AdherencePrimary Health CareHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsExpert ratingsFacilitationFidelityImplementation scienceIntegrated careMental healthPrimary careQuality

Identifiers

PMID28424052
PMCPMC5397744
OpenAlexW2606339713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.