Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423717›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Non-homologous end joining induced alterations in DNA methylation: A source of permanent epigenetic change.

Brittany Allen, Antonio Pezone, Antonio Porcellini, Mark T Muller, Michal M Masternak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Somatic mutation as an explanation for epigenetic aging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Brittany AllenCollege of Medicine, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Antonio PezoneDipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del C.N.R., Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Antonio PorcelliniDipartimento di Biologia, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Mark T MullerEpigenetics Division, TopoGEN, Inc., Buena Vista, CO, USA.
Michal M MasternakCollege of Medicine, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Greater Poland Cancer Center · PLInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology · ITTopoGEN (United States) · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Dietary fat, visceral fat depots and agingR01AG032290 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI MASTERNAK, MICHAL MATEUSZ · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Single Somatic Cell Epigenetic ModelsR43GM113286 · NIGMS · TOPOGEN, INC. · PI MULLER, MARK · 2015 to 2016
$598k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032290NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM113286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to genetic mutations, epigenetic revision plays a major role in the development and progression of cancer; specifically, inappropriate DNA methylation or demethylation of CpG residues may alter the expression of genes that promote tumorigenesis. We hypothesize that DNA repair, specifically the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) by Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) may play a role in this process. Using a GFP reporter system inserted into the genome of HeLa cells, we are able to induce targeted DNA damage that enables the cells, after successfully undergoing NHEJ repair, to express WT GFP. These GFP+ cells were segregated into two expression classes, one with robust expression (Bright) and the other with reduced expression (Dim). Using a DNA hypomethylating drug (AzadC) we demonstrated that the different GFP expression levels was due to differential methylation statuses of CpGs in regions on either side of the break site. Deep sequencing analysis of this area in sorted Bright and Dim populations revealed a collection of different epi-alleles that display patterns of DNA methylation following repair by NHEJ. These patterns differ between Bright and Dim cells which are hypo- and hypermethylated, respectively, and between the post-repair populations and the original, uncut cells. These data suggest that NHEJ repair facilitates a rewrite of the methylation landscape in repaired genes, elucidating a potential source for the altered methylation patterns seen in cancer cells, and understanding the mechanism by which this occurs could provide new therapeutic targets for preventing this process from contributing to tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAllelesAzacitidineCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticCpG IslandsDecitabineDNA End-Joining RepairDNA MethylationDoxycyclineEpigenesis, GeneticGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansNeoplasmsAzacitidineDecitabineDoxycyclineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsDNA damageDNA methylationDNA repairNHEJ repair

Identifiers

PMID28423717
PMCPMC5522286
OpenAlexW2592170360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.