Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423524›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2017

Critically short telomeres and toxicity of chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Miguel Quintela-Fandino, Nora Soberon, Ana Lluch, Luis Manso, Isabel Calvo, Javier Cortes, Fernando Moreno-Antón, Miguel Gil-Gil, Noelia Martinez-Jánez, Antonio Gonzalez-Martin and 16 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The fetal programming of telomere biology hypothesis: an update.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Quintela-FandinoBreast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
Nora SoberonTelomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
Ana LluchMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Luis MansoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel CalvoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital de Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain.
Javier CortesMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando Moreno-AntónMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Gil-GilMedical Oncology Department, Institut Catala d'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Noelia Martinez-JánezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Gonzalez-MartinMedical Oncology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
Encarna AdroverMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Raquel de AndresMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Gemma ViñasMedical Oncology Department, Institut Catala d'Oncologia-Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Antonio Llombart-CussacMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Emilio AlbaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Silvana MouronBreast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
Juan GuerraMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
Begoña BermejoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Esther ZamoraMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Angel García-SaenzMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia Pernas SimonMedical Oncology Department, Institut Catala d'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Eva CarrascoGEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
María José EscuderoGEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
Ruth CampoGEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
Ramón ColomerMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Maria A BlascoTelomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain.
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESGEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESHospital General Universitario de Albacete · ESHospital Montecelo · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative toxicity from weekly paclitaxel (myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue) compromises long-term administration. Preclinical data suggest that the burden of critically short telomeres (< 3 kilobases, CSTs), but not average telomere length by itself, accounts for limited tissue renewal and turnover capacity. The impact of this parameter (which can be modified with different therapies) in chemotherapy-derived toxicity has not been studied.Blood from 115 treatment-naive patients from a clinical trial in early HER2-negative breast cancer that received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks) either alone or in combination with nintedanib and from 85 healthy controls was prospectively obtained and individual CSTs and average telomere lenght were determined by HT Q-FISH (high-throughput quantitative FISH). Toxicity was graded according to NCI common toxicity criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE V.4.0). The variable under study was "number of toxic episodes" during the 12 weeks of therapy.The percentage of CSTs ranged from 6.5%-49.4% and was directly associated with the number of toxic events (R2 = 0.333; P < 0.001). According to a linear regression model, each 18% increase in the percentage of CSTs was associated to one additional toxic episode during the paclitaxel cycles; this effect was independent of the age or treatment arm. Patients in the upper quartile (> 21.9% CSTs) had 2-fold higher number of neuropathy (P = 0.04) or fatigue (P = 0.019) episodes and >3-fold higher number of myalgia episodes (P = 0.005). The average telomere length was unrelated to the incidence of side effects.The percentage of CSTs, but not the average telomere size, is associated with weekly paclitaxel-derived toxicity.

Indexed as

Telomere ShorteningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansIndolesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelTelomereAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesnintedanibPaclitaxelbreast cancercritically short telomerestelomere lengthtoxicityweekly paclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID28423524
PMCPMC5400599
OpenAlexW2590489081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.