Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423514›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Mitotic read-out genes confer poor outcome in luminal A breast cancer tumors.

Javier Pérez-Peña, Ana Alcaraz-Sanabria, Cristina Nieto-Jiménez, Raquel Páez, Verónica Corrales-Sánchez, Leticia Serrano-Oviedo, Vikram B Wali, Gauri A Patwardhan, Eitan Amir, Balázs Győrffy and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of the Expression ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Javier Pérez-PeñaTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Ana Alcaraz-SanabriaTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Cristina Nieto-JiménezTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Raquel PáezTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Verónica Corrales-SánchezTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Leticia Serrano-OviedoTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
Vikram B WaliYale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Gauri A PatwardhanYale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Eitan AmirDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Balázs GyőrffySemmelweis University 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Budapest, Hungary.
Atanasio PandiellaCancer Research Center and CIBERONC, CSIC-University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Alberto OcañaTranslational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital and Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomedicas (CRIB), Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESYale Cancer Center · USCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences · HUUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luminal breast tumors have been classified into A and B subgroups, with the luminal A being associated with a more favorable clinical outcome. Unfortunately, luminal A tumors do not have a universally good prognosis. We used transcriptomic analyses using public datasets to evaluate the differential expression between normal breast tissue and breast cancer, focusing on upregulated genes included in cell cycle function. Association of selected genes with relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using the KM Plotter Online Tool (http://www.kmplot.com). Seventy-seven genes were differentially expressed between normal and malignant breast tissue. Only five genes were associated with poor RFS and OS. The mitosis-related genes GTSE1, CDCA3, FAM83D and SMC4 were associated with poor outcome specifically in Luminal A tumors. The combination of FAM83D and CDCA3 for RFS and GTSE1 alone for OS showed the better prediction for clinical outcome. CDCA3 was amplified in 3.4% of the tumors, and FAM83D and SMC4 in 2.3% and 2.2%, respectively. In conclusion, we describe a set of genes that predict detrimental outcome in Luminal A tumors. These genes may have utility for stratification in trials of antimitotic agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy, or as candidates for direct target inhibition.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier Estimatebreast cancerclinical outcomeluminal Amitotic kinases

Identifiers

PMID28423514
PMCPMC5400619
OpenAlexW2591139521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.