Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423454›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2017

UK NEQAS survey of allergen component testing across the United Kingdom and other European countries.

R Saleem, C Keymer, D Patel, W Egner, A W Rowbottom

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R SaleemDepartment of Immunology, Pathology Directorate, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-9414
C KeymerDepartment of Immunology, Pathology Directorate, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
D PatelUK NEQAS Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy (IIA), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
W EgnerUK NEQAS Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy (IIA), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
A W RowbottomDepartment of Immunology, Pathology Directorate, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical utility of molecular diagnostic approaches in allergy investigation is being recognized increasingly to play a significant role in the management of allergic patients. Determining the sensitization pattern, which is best achieved through the use of component resolved diagnostics (CRD), allows effective risk stratification, appropriate treatment and patient selection for immunotherapy. In order to assess the diagnostic service provisions for in-vitro allergy testing across Europe, a survey was carried out via the total immunoglobulin (Ig)E and specific IgE external quality assurance schemes run by UK National External Quality Assessment Service (NEQAS) Immunology, Immunochemistry and Allergy. This survey assessed allergy testing, and in particular allergen components offered by the laboratories, and found a wide variability in service provision, particularly between the United Kingdom and other European Union (EU) countries. Furthermore, there was lack of standardization for acquisition of clinical information to aid allergen (and component) selection, gating strategy, testing algorithms and clinical interpretation. Interestingly, a significant proportion of laboratories (the majority from EU) stated that they 'used' the results for peanut components for risk stratification. However, the vast majority of participants were unaware of guidelines relating to the use of allergen component testing, and agreed that further education would assist in reaching a common platform. Hence, this survey has highlighted that although CRD has been adopted into routine diagnostics across Europe, it is potentially compromised by lack of standardized protocols and guidance sources. Consequently, there is a need for local or national standards and education through External Quality Assurance services on the performance and application of CRD into allergy investigation.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAllergensHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EImmunologic TestsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAllergensImmunoglobulin Eallergenic componentsallergic risk stratificationallergy testingcomponent-resolved diagnosticsmolecular-based allergy

Identifiers

PMID28423454
PMCPMC5422853
OpenAlexW2754074438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.