ArticleJAMA cardiology2017
Adherence to High-Intensity Statins Following a Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06551298 (Multi Center Clinical Study on the Lipid-lowering Efficacy and Safety of Menggongzi Tibetan Tea Special Drink), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi Center Clinical Study on the Lipid-lowering Efficacy and Safety of Menggongzi Tibetan Tea Special Drink
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical effectiveness and safety of low/moderate-intensity statins & ezetimibe combination therapy vs. high-intensity statin monotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Medication Adherence After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Women Compared With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Financial Incentives for Process, Outcomes, or Both on Cholesterol Level Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Qualitative Exploration of Barriers to Statin Adherence and Lipid Control: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Effect of Patient Financial Incentives on Statin Adherence and Lipid Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020 · on this mapTrial
- Prevalence and factors influencing medication adherence after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Review
- Electronic Health Record Alerts to Improve Lipid Lowering After a Recent Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026 · on this mapObservational
- Moderate-Intensity Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Versus High-Intensity Atorvastatin in Patients with Angina Pectoris who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- A polypill strategy for lipid lowering and anti-platelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: A pilot randomized controlled trial.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use and Adherence in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Utilization and discontinuation of secondary prevention pharmacotherapy after myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Early Management of Blood Lipid Levels with Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Mini Review.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Review
- Therapeutic inertia in statin therapy for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide population-based cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Earlier the Better.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Therapeutic Adherence During Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Review
- Adherence to phase I cardiac rehabilitation in post-PCI patients: a latent class analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Recurrent Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events Potentially Prevented with Guideline-Recommended Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy following Myocardial Infarction.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: High-intensity statins are recommended following myocardial infarction. However, patients may not continue taking this medication with high adherence. Objective: To estimate the proportion of patients filling high-intensity statin prescriptions following myocardial infarction who continue taking this medication with high adherence and to analyze factors associated with continuing a high-intensity statin with high adherence after myocardial infarction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients following hospitalization for myocardial infarction. Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 75 years (n = 29 932) and older than 75 years (n = 27 956) hospitalized for myocardial infarction between 2007 and 2012 who filled a high-intensity statin prescription (atorvastatin, 40-80 mg, and rosuvastatin, 20-40 mg) within 30 days of discharge. Beneficiaries had Medicare fee-for-service coverage including pharmacy benefits. Exposures: Sociodemographic, dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage, comorbidities, not filling high-intensity statin prescriptions before their myocardial infarction (ie, new users), and cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient cardiologist visits after discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: High adherence to high-intensity statins at 6 months and 2 years after discharge was defined by a proportion of days covered of at least 80%, down-titration was defined by switching to a low/moderate-intensity statin with a proportion of days covered of at least 80%, and low adherence was defined by a proportion of days covered less than 80% for any statin intensity without discontinuation. Discontinuation was defined by not having a statin available to take in the last 60 days of each follow-up period. Results: Approximately half of the beneficiaries were women and fourth-fifths were white. At 6 months and 2 years after discharge among beneficiaries 66 to 75 years of age, 17 633 (58.9%) and 10 308 (41.6%) were taking high-intensity statins with high adherence, 2605 (8.7%) and 3315 (13.4%) down-titrated, 5182 (17.3%) and 4727 (19.1%) had low adherence, and 3705 (12.4%) and 4648 (18.8%) discontinued their statin, respectively. The proportion taking high-intensity statins with high adherence increased between 2007 and 2012. African American patients, Hispanic patients, and new high-intensity statin users were less likely to take high-intensity statins with high adherence, and those with dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage and more cardiologist visits after discharge and who participated in cardiac rehabilitation were more likely to take high-intensity statins with high adherence. Results were similar among beneficiaries older than 75 years of age. Conclusions and Relevance: Many patients filling high-intensity statins following a myocardial infarction do not continue taking this medication with high adherence for 2 years postdischarge. Interventions are needed to increase high-intensity statin use and adherence after myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.