Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii).

Liana F Wait, Samantha Fox, Sarah Peck, Michelle L Power

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeted molecular screening for protozoan parasites in wild platypuses (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Zoonotic giardiasis: an update.Parasitology research · 2021
    Review
  6. Prevalence and molecular characterization of novel species of the Diplomonad genusInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropozoonotic significance, risk factors and spatial distribution ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Article
  10. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liana F WaitDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-9336
Samantha FoxSave the Tasmanian Devil Program, The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Sarah PeckSave the Tasmanian Devil Program, The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Michelle L PowerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is a carnivorous marsupial found only in the wild in Tasmania, Australia. Tasmanian devils are classified as endangered and are currently threatened by devil facial tumour disease, a lethal transmissible cancer that has decimated the wild population in Tasmania. To prevent extinction of Tasmanian devils, conservation management was implemented in 2003 under the Save the Tasmanian Devil Program. This study aimed to assess if conservation management was altering the interactions between Tasmanian devils and their parasites. Molecular tools were used to investigate the prevalence and diversity of two protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium and Giardia, in Tasmanian devils. A comparison of parasite prevalence between wild and captive Tasmanian devils showed that both Cryptosporidium and Giardia were significantly more prevalent in wild devils (p < 0.05); Cryptosporidium was identified in 37.9% of wild devils but only 10.7% of captive devils, while Giardia was identified in 24.1% of wild devils but only 0.82% of captive devils. Molecular analysis identified the presence of novel genotypes of both Cryptosporidium and Giardia. The novel Cryptosporidium genotype was 98.1% similar at the 18S rDNA to Cryptosporidium varanii (syn. C. saurophilum) with additional samples identified as C. fayeri, C. muris, and C. galli. Two novel Giardia genotypes, TD genotype 1 and TD genotype 2, were similar to G. duodenalis from dogs (94.4%) and a Giardia assemblage A isolate from humans (86.9%). Giardia duodenalis BIV, a zoonotic genotype of Giardia, was also identified in a single captive Tasmanian devil. These findings suggest that conservation management may be altering host-parasite interactions in the Tasmanian devil, and the presence of G. duodenalis BIV in a captive devil points to possible human-devil parasite transmission.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanAnimalsAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDogsEndangered SpeciesGenotypeGiardia lambliaGiardiasisHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansMarsupialiaPhylogenyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID28423030
PMCPMC5397283
OpenAlexW2605951050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.