Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423027›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Comparison of T2*-weighted and QSM contrasts in Parkinson's disease to visualize the STN with MRI.

Anneke Alkemade, Gilles de Hollander, Max C Keuken, Andreas Schäfer, Derek V M Ott, Johannes Schwarz, David Weise, Sonja A Kotz, Birte U Forstmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Present and Future of Ultra-High Field MRI in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. A deep brain stimulation-conditioned RF coil for 3T MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computational Neurosurgery in Deep Brain Stimulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anneke AlkemadeAmsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3234-353X
Gilles de HollanderAmsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max C KeukenAmsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andreas SchäferMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Derek V M OttMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes SchwarzKlinik Haag, Oberbayern/Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
David WeiseKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sonja A KotzMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Birte U ForstmannAmsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) plays a crucial role in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Studies investigating optimal protocols for STN visualization using state of the art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have shown that susceptibility weighted images, which display the magnetic susceptibility distribution, yield better results than T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and T2*-weighted contrasts. However, these findings are based on young healthy individuals, and require validation in elderly individuals and persons suffering from PD. Using 7T MRI, the present study set out to investigate which MRI contrasts yielded the best results for STN visualization in 12 PD patients and age-matched healthy controls (HC). We found that STNs were more difficult to delineate in PD as reflected by a lower inter-rater agreement when compared to HCs. No STN size differences were observed between the groups. Analyses of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images showed a higher inter-rater agreement reflected by increased Dice-coefficients. The location of the center of mass of the STN was not affected by contrast. Overall, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were higher in QSM than in T2*-weighted images. This can at least partially, explain the higher inter-rater agreement in QSM. The current results indicate that the calculation of QSM contrasts contributes to an improved visualization of the entire STN. We conclude that QSM contrast is the preferred choice for the visualization of the STN in persons with PD as well as in aging HC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDeep Brain StimulationDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSignal-To-Noise RatioSubthalamic Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID28423027
PMCPMC5397046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.