ArticleJCI insight2017
First-in-human trial of multikinase VEGF inhibitor regorafenib and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab in advanced cancer patients.
Article in JCI insight, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling regorafenib resistance: metabolic reprogramming, tumor plasticity, and novel approaches to overcome therapy failure.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Exploring research frontiers and emerging trends of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- EGFR, the Lazarus target for precision oncology in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Review
- Resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: underlying mechanisms and reversal strategies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
- Novel Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pathway Inhibitors for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Updated Insights on EGFR Signaling Pathways in Glioma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Combination of Anti-EGFR and Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Treatment of Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Imposing Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trials of Targeted Drugs for Glioblastoma: Current Status and Progress.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Basics to advances in nanotherapy of colorectal cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020Review
- Revisiting anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma.Translational cancer research · 2019Article
- A phase 1b study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of regorafenib in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumors.International journal of cancer · 2019Article
- Genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal cancer and its fidelity to the genomics of the tumor biopsy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Precision treatment in colorectal cancer: Now and the future.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019Review
- Short-term 3D culture systems of various complexity for treatment optimization of colorectal carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Therapy for Cancer: Strategy of Combining Anti-Angiogenic and Target Therapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe combination of multikinase VEGF inhibitor regorafenib and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab overcomes intrinsic and acquired resistance in both EGFR-sensitive and EGFR-resistant preclinical models of colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsUtilizing a standard 3+3 design, a phase I study was designed to determine safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the regorafenib plus cetuximab combination among patients with advanced cancer including CRC. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on the exceptional responder.
resultsAmong the 27 patients enrolled the median age was 54 years. None of 19 patients treated at dose level 1 (cetuximab i.v. 200 mg/m2 followed by 150 mg/m2 weekly + regorafenib 80 mg daily) experienced a DLT, and 2 of 5 patients treated at dose level 2 (cetuximab i.v. 200 mg/m2 followed by 150 mg/m2 weekly + regorafenib 120 mg daily) experienced a DLT (grade 3 thrombocytopenia [n = 1] and grade 3 intra-abdominal bleed [n = 1]). Most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 rash (20 patients). Of 24 evaluable patients, 11 (46%) patients had clinical benefit (stable disease > 6 cycles or partial response [PR]) (CRC n = 8, one patient each with head and neck cancer, carcinoma of unknown primary, and glioblastoma). A CRC patient, who progressed on anti-EGFR and regorafenib, achieved a PR (46% decrease per RECIST v1.1) lasting 15 months. Genomic profiling of an exceptional responder with response for over 27 cycles revealed hypermutated genotype with microsatellite instability (MSI).
conclusionRegorafenib 80 mg daily plus cetuximab 200 mg/m2 loading dose, followed by 150 mg/m2 every week is the MTD/recommended phase II dose. The combination demonstrated early signals of activity in wild-type CRC, including 1 exceptional responder with MSI high.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02095054FUNDING. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported by the NIH Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672. This work was supported in part by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas grant RP110584 and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant UL1 TR000371 (Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.