Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28422397›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2017

A novel radiation protection device based on tungsten functional paper for application in interventional radiology.

Hajime Monzen, Mikoto Tamura, Kohei Shimomura, Yuichi Onishi, Shinichi Nakayama, Takahiro Fujimoto, Kenji Matsumoto, Kohei Hanaoka, Takeshi Kamomae

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hajime MonzenDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kindai University, Osakasayama, 589-8511, Japan.
Mikoto TamuraDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kindai University, Osakasayama, 589-8511, Japan.
Kohei ShimomuraClinical Radiology Service Division, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, 589-8511, Japan.
Yuichi OnishiDivision of Clinical Radiology Service, Okayama Central Hospital, Okayama, 700-0017, Japan.
Shinichi NakayamaDivision of Clinical Radiology Service, Okayama Central Hospital, Okayama, 700-0017, Japan.
Takahiro FujimotoClinical Radiology Service Division, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kenji MatsumotoDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kindai University, Osakasayama, 589-8511, Japan.
Kohei HanaokaDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kindai University, Osakasayama, 589-8511, Japan.
Takeshi KamomaeDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Kindai University Hospital · JPOkayama Central Hospital · JPKindai University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tungsten functional paper (TFP), which contains 80% tungsten by weight, has radiation-shielding properties. We investigated the use of TFP for the protection of operators during interventional or therapeutic angiography. The air kerma rate of scattered radiation from a simulated patient was measured, with and without TFP, using a water-equivalent phantom and fixed C-arm fluoroscopy. Measurements were taken at the level of the operator's eye, chest, waist, and knee, with a variable number of TFP sheets used for shielding. A Monte Carlo simulation was also utilized to analyze the dose rate delivered with and without the TFP shielding. In cine mode, when the number of TFP sheets was varied through 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10, the respective reduction in the air kerma rate relative to no TFP shielding was as follows: at eye level, 24.9%, 29.9%, 41.6%, 50.4%, and 56.2%; at chest level, 25.3%, 33.1%, 34.9%, 46.1%, and 44.3%; at waist level, 45.1%, 57.0%, 64.4%, 70.7%, and 75.2%; and at knee level, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.1%, and 2.1%. In fluoroscopy mode, the respective reduction in the air kerma rate relative to no TFP shielding was as follows: at eye level, 24.8%, 30.3%, 34.8%, 51.1%, and 58.5%; at chest level, 25.8%, 33.4%, 35.5%, 45.2%, and 44.4%; at waist level, 44.6%, 56.8%, 64.7%, 71.7%, and 77.2%; and at knee level, 2.2%, 0.0%, 2.2%, 2.8%, and 2.5%. The TFP paper exhibited good radiation-shielding properties against the scattered radiation encountered in clinical settings, and was shown to have potential application in decreasing the radiation exposure to the operator during interventional radiology.

Indexed as

TungstenFluoroscopyHumansOccupational ExposureRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionRadiography, InterventionalRadiology, InterventionalTungstenfluoroscopyinterventional radiologyradiation protectionscattered radiationtungsten functional paper

Identifiers

PMID28422397
PMCPMC5689848
OpenAlexW2607159872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.