Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2017
What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effect of a voucher incentive on a survey response rate in the clinical setting: a quasi-randomized controlled trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2018Trial
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validation of the Mini-OAKHQoL for Knee/Hip Osteoarthritis in a Syrian Arabic-Speaking Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Bridging the digital divide: increasing response rates to electronic pain questionnaires in outpatient neurosurgery.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Proxy Survey Cost Indicators in Interviewer-Administered Surveys: Are they Actually Correlated with Costs?Journal of survey statistics and methodology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and short-term change in symptoms of anxiety and depression following bariatric surgery: a prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2024Observational
- Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes following pancreatic injury - An international multicenter cohort study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Selection of and Response to Physical Activity-Based Social Comparisons in a Digital Environment: Series of Daily Assessment Studies.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Latent tuberculosis screening and treatment in HIV: highly acceptable in a prospective cohort study.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Childhood Disintegrative Disorder (CDD): Symptomatology of the Norwegian Patient Population and Parents' Experiences of Patient Regression.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Short Versions of the Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for Yemeni Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Validity and reliability of the Mini-Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Quality of Life scale in Turkish population.Archives of rheumatology · 2022Article
- Changes in Digital Media Use and Physical Activity in German Young Adults under the Covid-19 Pandemic - A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2021Article
- Promoting patient followup treatment with intra-detrusor onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- Investigating Ethnic Disparity in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation in the UK: Patient-Identified Reasons for Non-Donation among Family Members.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Differences in self-perceived general health, pain, and depression 1 to 5 years post-stroke related to work status at 1 year.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesResponse rates to health-related surveys are declining. This study tested two strategies to improve the response rate to a health psychology survey mailed through English general practices: (1) sending a shortened questionnaire and (2) offering a monetary incentive to return a completed questionnaire.
designRandomized controlled trial.
methodsAdults (n = 4,241) aged 45-59 years, from four General Practices in South-East England, were mailed a survey on attitudes towards bowel cancer screening. Using a 2 × 4 factorial design, participants were randomized to receive a 'short' (four A4 pages) or a 'long' (seven A4 pages) questionnaire, and one of four monetary incentives to return a completed questionnaire - (1) no monetary incentive, (2) £2.50 shop voucher, (3) £5.00 shop voucher, and (4) inclusion in a £250 shop voucher prize draw. Age, gender, and area-level deprivation were obtained from the General Practices.
resultsThe overall response rate was 41% (n = 1,589). Response to the 'short' questionnaire (42%) was not significantly different from the 'long' questionnaire (40%). The £2.50 incentive (43%) significantly improved response rates in univariate analyses, and remained significant after controlling for age, gender, area-level deprivation, and questionnaire length. The £5.00 (42%) and £250 prize draw (41%) incentives had no significant impact on response rates compared to no incentive (38%).
conclusionsA small monetary incentive (£2.50) may slightly increase response to a mailed health psychology survey. The length of the questionnaire (four pages vs. seven pages) did not influence response. Although frequently used, entry into a prize draw did not increase response. Achieving representative samples remains a challenge for health psychology. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject Response rates to mailed questionnaires continue to decline, threatening the representativeness of data. Prize draw incentives are frequently used but there is little evidence to support their efficacy. Research on interactions between incentives, questionnaire length, and demographics is lacking. What does this study add Contrary to previous findings, questionnaire length did not influence response rate. A £2.50 incentive increased response, while incentives of £5.00 and a £250 prize draw did not. Achieving representative samples to questionnaires remains a challenge for health psychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.