Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28422299›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2017

Incorporation of pre-therapy

Gregory J Anthony, Alexandra Cunliffe, Richard Castillo, Ngoc Pham, Thomas Guerrero, Samuel G Armato, Hania A Al-Hallaq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IntegratingThoracic cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Head and Neck Cancer Care: Opportunities, Mechanics, and Challenges.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Challenges and Promises of PET Radiomics.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gregory J AnthonyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexandra CunliffeDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard CastilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Ngoc PhamBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas GuerreroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Samuel G ArmatoDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hania A Al-HallaqDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN MEDICAL PHYSICST32EB002103 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ARMATO, SAMUEL G. · 2003 to 2019
$4.7M
A Bayesian Framework for Inter-Modality Deformable Image Registration EvaluationK01CA181292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CASTILLO, RICHARD · 2013 to 2016
$478k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA181292NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB002103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the addition of standardized uptake value (SUV) from PET scans to CT lung texture features could improve a radiomics-based model of radiation pneumonitis (RP) diagnosis in patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anonymized data from 96 esophageal cancer patients (18 RP-positive cases of Grade ≥ 2) were collected including pre-therapy PET/CT scans, pre-/post-therapy diagnostic CT scans and RP status. Twenty texture features (first-order, fractal, Laws' filter and gray-level co-occurrence matrix) were calculated from diagnostic CT scans and compared in anatomically matched regions of the lung. Classifier performance (texture, SUV, or combination) was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). For each texture feature, logistic regression classifiers consisting of the average change in texture feature value and the pre-therapy SUV standard deviation (SUV

resultsWhile clinical parameters (mean lung dose, smoking history, tumor location) were not significantly different among patients with and without symptomatic RP, SUV and texture parameters were significantly associated with RP status. AUC for single-texture feature classifiers alone ranged from 0.58 to 0.81 and 0.53 to 0.71 in high-dose (≥ 30 Gy) and low-dose (< 10 Gy) regions of the lungs, respectively. AUC for SUV

conclusionsAddition of SUV

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansModels, TheoreticalPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation PneumonitisRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18CTPETradiation pneumonitisradiomicsSUVtexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID28422299
PMCPMC5503160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.