Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28422134›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Genetic structure and signatures of selection in grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos).

P Momigliano, R Harcourt, W D Robbins, V Jaiteh, G N Mahardika, A Sembiring, A Stow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The complete mitochondrial genome of a gray reef shark,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020
    Article
  13. Complete mitochondrial genome of the gray reef shark,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

P MomiglianoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
R HarcourtDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-2934
W D RobbinsCollege of Marine and Environmental Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
V JaitehCentre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
G N MahardikaThe Indonesian Biodiversity Research Centre, Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
A SembiringThe Indonesian Biodiversity Research Centre, Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
A StowDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUUdayana University · IDAustralian Wildlife Conservancy · AUMurdoch University · AUUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With overfishing reducing the abundance of marine predators in multiple marine ecosystems, knowledge of genetic structure and local adaptation may provide valuable information to assist sustainable management. Despite recent technological advances, most studies on sharks have used small sets of neutral markers to describe their genetic structure. We used 5517 nuclear single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) gene to characterize patterns of genetic structure and detect signatures of selection in grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos). Using samples from Australia, Indonesia and oceanic reefs in the Indian Ocean, we established that large oceanic distances represent barriers to gene flow, whereas genetic differentiation on continental shelves follows an isolation by distance model. In Australia and Indonesia differentiation at nuclear SNPs was weak, with coral reefs acting as stepping stones maintaining connectivity across large distances. Differentiation of mtDNA was stronger, and more pronounced in females, suggesting sex-biased dispersal. Four independent tests identified a set of loci putatively under selection, indicating that grey reef sharks in eastern Australia are likely under different selective pressures to those in western Australia and Indonesia. Genetic distances averaged across all loci were uncorrelated with genetic distances calculated from outlier loci, supporting the conclusion that different processes underpin genetic divergence in these two data sets. This pattern of heterogeneous genomic differentiation, suggestive of local adaptation, has implications for the conservation of grey reef sharks; furthermore, it highlights that marine species showing little genetic differentiation at neutral loci may exhibit patterns of cryptic genetic structure driven by local selection.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationAnimal DistributionAnimalsAustraliaConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGene FlowIndian OceanIndonesiaMaleModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticSharksDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28422134
PMCPMC5555095
OpenAlexW2606234484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.