ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017
Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- "I'm Pregnant, What Do I Do?": Exploring How People Having Abortions in Britain Find and Use Online Sources of Information.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Comparison of mifepristone plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Review
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortions and births in Sweden: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- It's a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference…: perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales.Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021Article
- Safe Abortion in Women's Hands: Autonomy and a Human Rights Approach to COVID-19 and Beyond.Health and human rights · 2021Article
- Toward normalising abortion: findings from a qualitative secondary analysis study.Culture, health & sexuality · 2020Article
- Normalising abortion: what role can health professionals play?BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2020Article
- Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain.Contraception · 2018Article
- Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the experiences of women in Scotland who return home to complete medical termination of pregnancy (TOP) ≤63 days of gestation, after being administered with mifepristone and misoprostol at an NHS TOP clinic.
designQualitative interview study.
settingOne National Health Service health board (administrative) area in Scotland. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Women in Scotland who had undergone medical TOP ≤63 days, and self-managed passing the pregnancy at home; recruited from three clinics in one NHS health board area between January and July 2014.
methodsIn-depth, semi-structured interviews with 44 women in Scotland who had recently undergone TOP ≤63 days of gestation, and who returned home to pass the pregnancy. Data were analysed thematically using an approach informed by the Framework method.
main outcome measuresWomen's experiences of self-management of TOP ≤63 days of gestation.
resultsKey themes emerging from the analysis related to self-administration of misoprostol in clinic; reasons for choosing home self-management; facilitation of self-management and expectation-setting; experiences of getting home; self-managing and monitoring treatment progress; support for self-management (in person and remotely); and pregnancy self-testing to confirm completion.
conclusionsParticipants primarily found self-administration of misoprostol and home self-management to be acceptable and/or preferable, particularly where this was experienced as a decision made jointly with health professionals. The way in which home self-management is presented to women at clinic requires ongoing attention. Women could benefit from the option of home administration of misoprostol. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women undergoing medical TOP 63 days found home self-management to be acceptable and/or preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.