Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28421456›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Filling the Void: A Review of Intragastric Balloons for Obesity.

Patrick Laing, Tuan Pham, Linda Jo Taylor, John Fang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Advances and future directions in endoscopic bariatric therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  3. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endobariatrics: a Still Underutilized Weight Loss Tool.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Intragastric balloon for weight reduction: rationale, benefits, risks and indications].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mechanical intestinal obstruction caused by displacement of a stomach balloon - case report.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick LaingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tuan PhamDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Linda Jo TaylorDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
John FangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. john.fang@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic bariatric therapies are predicted to become much more widely used in North America for obese patients who are not candidates for bariatric surgery. Of all the endoscopic bariatric therapies, intragastric balloons (IGBs) have the greatest amount of clinical experience and published data supporting their use. Three IGBs are FDA approved and are now commercially available in the USA (Orbera, ReShape Duo, and Obalon) with others likely soon to follow. They are generally indicated for patients whose BMI ranges from 30 to 40 mg/kg

Indexed as

Gastric BalloonBariatricsContraindicationsHumansObesityTreatment OutcomeBariatric medicineIntragastric balloonObalonOrberaReShape DuoWeight loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.