Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28421386›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2017

Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness in orthopedics: how to measure outcomes and deliver value in a constantly changing healthcare environment.

Jeremy M Burnham, Fabien Meta, Vincent Lizzio, Eric C Makhni, Kevin J Bozic

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Factors Influencing Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Scores in Patients Undergoing Upper Extremity Procedures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modifying MSC Phenotype to Facilitate Bone Healing: Biological Approaches.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy M BurnhamUPMC Center for Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Fabien MetaHenry Ford Health System, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Vincent LizzioHenry Ford Health System, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Eric C MakhniHenry Ford Health System, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Kevin J BozicDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1400 Barbara Jordan Blvd, Austin, TX, 78723, USA. kevin.bozic@austin.utexas.edu.
Henry Ford Hospital · USHenry Ford Health System · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this study is to review the basic concepts of healthcare value, patient outcome measurement, and cost-effectiveness analyses as they relate to the introduction of new surgical techniques and technologies in the field of orthopedic surgery. RECENT

findingsAn increased focus on financial stewardship in healthcare has resulted in a plethora of cost-effectiveness and patient outcome research. Recent research has made great progress in identifying orthopedic technologies that provide exceptional value and those that do not meet adequate standards for widespread adoption. As the pace of technological innovation advances in lockstep with an increased focus on value, orthopedic surgeons will need to have a working knowledge of value-based healthcare decision-making. Value-based healthcare and cost-effectiveness analyses can aid orthopedic surgeons in making ethical and fiscally responsible treatment choices for their patients.

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessHealthcarePatient-reported outcomesTechnology assessmentTime-driven activity-based cost identificationValue

Identifiers

PMID28421386
PMCPMC5435638
OpenAlexW2605695671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.