Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28421351›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2017

Characteristics and prognosis of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of registry data.

Masayoshi Yasui, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, Masaki Mori, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yasuo Nakashima, Toshirou Nishida, Kinki GIST Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of contour maps on estimating the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence: indications for adjuvant therapy: an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Decreasing the burden: An unusual GIST presentation, a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masayoshi YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Nakamichi 1-3-3, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan. myasui-gi@umin.ac.jp.
Toshimasa TsujinakaDepartment of Surgery, Kaizuka City Hospital, Hori 3-10-20, Kaizuka, Osaka, 597-0015, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2(E2), Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2(E2), Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yasuo NakashimaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Fudegasaki-cho 5-30, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 543-8555, Japan.
Toshirou NishidaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kinki GIST Study Group
Osaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPTakarazuka City Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. Accordingly, their clinical features are not well-documented and optimal treatment has not been established. The objective of this study is to clarify the rates and patterns of recurrence after surgical resection of rectal GISTs, with a focus on outcomes and therapeutic modalities.

methodsThe registry was designed to collect data on rectal GISTs recorded between January, 2003 and December, 2007 at 40 participating institutions of the Kinki GIST Study Group. The principal variables were the rates and patterns of recurrence of rectal GISTs. Other study variables were age, sex, tumor size, mitotic count, distance from the anal verge, tumor location, surgical procedures, surgical margins, and recurrence-free survival.

resultsTwenty-four cases were registered, 11 (45.8%) of which were classified as high-risk by the modified NIH criteria. Locoregional recurrence (7/23, 30.4%) was the predominant recurrence pattern after curative resection, with rates that did not differ after local excision (33.3%; 3/9) vs. extended resection (28.6%; 4/14). The recurrence rates were high (25.0%) even for patients with low-risk disease. There was only one case of recurrence among patients who received perioperative treatment with imatinib.

conclusionsRectal GISTs showed high rates of local recurrence regardless of the surgical procedure. Perioperative treatment with imatinib may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsData Interpretation, StatisticalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPerioperative CareAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateGastrointestinal stromal tumorsRectumRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID28421351
OpenAlexW2606367398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.