Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28421292›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2017

Phylogenetic Insight into Zika and Emerging Viruses for a Perspective on Potential Hosts.

Diana S Weber, Karen A Alroy, Samuel M Scheiner

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana S WeberS&T Policy Fellowship, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. diana.weber@gmail.com.
Karen A AlroyDivision of Environmental Biology, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230, USA.
Samuel M ScheinerDivision of Environmental Biology, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230, USA.
U.S. National Science Foundation · USAmerican Association For The Advancement of Science · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global viral diversity is substantial, but viruses that contribute little to the public health burden or to agricultural damage receive minimal attention until a seemingly unimportant virus becomes a threat. The Zika virus (ZIKV) illustrated this, as there was limited information and awareness of the virus when it was identified as a public health emergency in February 2016. Predicting which virus may pose a future threat is difficult. This is in part because significant knowledge gaps in the basic biology and ecology of an emerging virus can impede policy development, delay decision making, and hinder public health action. We suggest using a phylogenetic framework of pathogens and their infected host species for insight into which animals may serve as reservoirs. For example, examining flaviviruses closely related to ZIKV, the phylogenetic framework indicates New World monkeys are the most likely candidates to be potential reservoirs for ZIKV. Secondarily, mammals that are in close proximity to humans should be considered because of the increased opportunity for pathogen exchange. The increase in human-mediated environmental change is accelerating the probability of another previously overlooked virus becoming a significant concern. By investing in basic science research and organizing our knowledge into an evolutionary framework, we will be better prepared to respond to the next emerging infectious disease.

Indexed as

PhylogenyZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsHumansPublic HealthArthropod vectorsEmerging virusesFlavivirusHostsPhylogenetic associationsReservoirsZika

Identifiers

PMID28421292
PMCPMC5596032
OpenAlexW2606442755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.