Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28421171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2017

Tactile Stimulation to Stimulate Spontaneous Breathing during Stabilization of Preterm Infants at Birth: A Retrospective Analysis.

Janneke Dekker, Tessa Martherus, Sophie J E Cramer, Henriette A van Zanten, Stuart B Hooper, Arjan B Te Pas

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04056091 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Back Rubs or Foot Flicks for Neonatal Stimulation at Birth in a Low-resource Setting: an Open-label Randomised Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital PadovaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled186ConditionsNeonatal ResuscitationArmsBack rub stimulation, Foot flicks stimulation
NCT04528030 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability

TypeinterventionalSponsorInspiration HealthcareRan2021 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsApnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia NeonatalArmsWAVE device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Clinical Guidelines.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The effect of sensory stimulation on apnea of prematurity.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janneke DekkerDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Tessa MartherusDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Sophie J E CramerDepartment of Medical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Henriette A van ZantenDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Center, MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arjan B Te PasDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTactile maneuvers to stimulate breathing in preterm infants are recommended during the initial assessment at birth, but it is not known how often and how this is applied. We evaluated the occurrence and patterns of tactile stimulation during stabilization of preterm infants at birth.

methodsRecordings of physiological parameters and videos of infants <32 weeks gestational age were retrospectively analyzed. Details of tactile stimulation during the first 7 min after birth (timing, duration, type, and indication) were noted.

resultsStimulation was performed in 164/245 (67%) infants. The median (IQR) GA was 28 6/7 (27 2/7-30 1/7) weeks, birth weight 1,153 (880-1,385) g, Apgar score at 5 min was 8 (7-9), 140/245 (57%) infants were born after cesarean section, and 134/245 (55%) were male. There were no significant differences between the stimulated and the non-stimulated infants with regard to basic characteristics. In the stimulated infants, the first episode of stimulation was given at a median (IQR) of 114 (73-182) s after birth. Stimulation was repeated 3 (1-5) times, with a median (IQR) duration of 8 (4-16) s and a total duration of 32 (15-64) s. Modes of stimulation were: rubbing (68%) or flicking (2%) the soles of the feet, rubbing the back (12%), a combination (9%), or other (8%). In 67% of the stimulation episodes, a clear indication was noted (25% bradycardia, 57% apnea, 48% hypoxemia, 43% combination) and an effect was observed in 18% of these indicated stimulation episodes. A total effect of all stimulation episodes per infant remains unclear, but infants who did not receive stimulation were more often intubated in the delivery room (14/79 (18%) vs 12/164 (7%),

conclusionThere was a large variation in the use of tactile stimulation in preterm infants during stabilization at birth. In most cases, there was an indication for stimulation, but only in a small proportion an effect could be observed.

Indexed as

birthbreathingpretermstabilizationstimulationtactile

Identifiers

PMID28421171
PMCPMC5377072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.