ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017
Exploiting Wild Relatives for Genomics-assisted Breeding of Perennial Crops.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape Genomic Tools Can Inform Future Rootstock and Farmland Selection for an Agricultural Tree Nut From Its Wild Relatives.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Mixed-Pathogen Infections in Vegetatively Propagated Crops: From Biological Synergism to Integrated Management.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AlleleMiner: a long-read pipeline for gene-wise de novo allele phasing and variant detection in diploid citrus cultivars.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- Development of KASP Molecular Markers and Candidate Gene Mining for Heat Tolerance-Related Traits inGenes · 2025Article
- Integrating Traditional Breeding and Modern Biotechnology for Advanced Forest Tree Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genomic Prediction of Adaptation in Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic resources for crop wild relatives are critical for perennial fruit breeding and conservation.American journal of botany · 2025Review
- The genome ofHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Fraxinus excelsior updated long-read genome reveals the importance of MADS-box genes in tolerance mechanisms against ash dieback.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Directed mutagenesis in fruit crops.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Article
- Taming the wild: domesticating untapped northern fruit tree and shrub resources in the era of high-throughput technologies.AoB PLANTS · 2025Review
- Kiwifruit in the Omics Age: Advances in Genomics, Breeding, and Beyond.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advanced Biotechnological Interventions in Mitigating Drought Stress in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Integrating genomics and genome editing for orphan crop improvement: a bridge between orphan crops and modern agriculture system.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Multigenic resistance to Xylella fastidiosa in wild grapes (Vitis sps.) and its implications within a changing climate.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Autochthonous Apple Cultivars from the Campania Region (Southern Italy): Bio-Agronomic and Qualitative Traits.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Crop Wild Relatives: A Valuable Source of Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Editorial: Harnessing genebanks: High-throughput phenotyping and genotyping of crop wild relatives and landraces.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating the Comprehensive Application of Herbaceous Peony at Low Latitudes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perennial crops are vital contributors to global food production and nutrition. However, the breeding of new perennial crops is an expensive and time-consuming process due to the large size and lengthy juvenile phase of many species. Genomics provides a valuable tool for improving the efficiency of breeding by allowing progeny possessing a trait of interest to be selected at the seed or seedling stage through marker-assisted selection (MAS). The benefits of MAS to a breeder are greatest when the targeted species takes a long time to reach maturity and is expensive to grow and maintain. Thus, MAS holds particular promise in perennials since they are often costly and time-consuming to grow to maturity and evaluate. Well-characterized germplasm that breeders can tap into for improving perennials is often limited in genetic diversity. Wild relatives are a largely untapped source of desirable traits including disease resistance, fruit quality, and rootstock characteristics. This review focuses on the use of genomics-assisted breeding in perennials, especially as it relates to the introgression of useful traits from wild relatives. The identification of genetic markers predictive of beneficial phenotypes derived from wild relatives is hampered by genomic tools designed for domesticated species that are often ill-suited for use in wild relatives. There is therefore an urgent need for better genomic resources from wild relatives. A further barrier to exploiting wild diversity through genomics is the phenotyping bottleneck: well-powered genetic mapping requires accurate and cost-effective characterization of large collections of diverse wild germplasm. While genomics will always be used in combination with traditional breeding methods, it is a powerful tool for accelerating the speed and reducing the costs of breeding while harvesting the potential of wild relatives for improving perennial crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.