Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420881›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Reduced biological effect of e-cigarette aerosol compared to cigarette smoke evaluated in vitro using normalized nicotine dose and RNA-seq-based toxicogenomics.

Linsey E Haswell, Andrew Baxter, Anisha Banerjee, Ivan Verrastro, Jessica Mushonganono, Jason Adamson, David Thorne, Marianna Gaça, Emmanuel Minet

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linsey E HaswellBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Andrew BaxterBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Anisha BanerjeeBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Ivan VerrastroBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Jessica MushonganonoBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Jason AdamsonBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
David ThorneBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Marianna GaçaBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
Emmanuel MinetBritish American Tobacco R&D Centre, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK. emmanuel_minet@BAT.com.
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) use has increased globally and could potentially offer a lower risk alternative to cigarette smoking. Here, we assessed the transcriptional response of a primary 3D airway model acutely exposed to e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette (3R4F) smoke. Aerosols were generated with standard intense smoking regimens with careful consideration for dose by normalizing the exposures to nicotine. Two e-cigarette aerosol dilutions were tested for equivalent and higher nicotine delivery compared to 3R4F. RNA was extracted at 24 hrs and 48 hrs post exposure for RNA-seq. 873 and 205 RNAs were differentially expressed for 3R4F smoke at 24 hrs and 48 hrs using a pFDR < 0.01 and a [fold change] > 2 threshold. 113 RNAs were differentially expressed at the highest dose of e-cigarette aerosol using a looser threshold of pFDR < 0.05, 3 RNAs exceeded a fold change of 2. Geneset enrichment analysis revealed a clear response from lung cancer, inflammation, and fibrosis associated genes after 3R4F smoke exposure. Metabolic/biosynthetic processes, extracellular membrane, apoptosis, and hypoxia were identified for e-cigarette exposures, albeit with a lower confidence score. Based on equivalent or higher nicotine delivery, an acute exposure to e-cigarette aerosol had a reduced impact on gene expression compared to 3R4F smoke exposure in vitro.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCells, CulturedCigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineRespiratory MucosaVapingNicotine

Identifiers

PMID28420881
PMCPMC5429854
OpenAlexW2606468407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.