Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420664›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

The UK Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Interventional Anaemia Response (CAVIAR) Study: protocol for an observational cohort study to determine the impact and effect of preoperative anaemia management in cardiac and vascular surgical patients.

Marisa Chau, Toby Richards, Caroline Evans, Anna Butcher, Timothy Collier, Andrew Klein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02637102 (The UK CArdiac and Vascular Surgery Interventional Anaemia Response Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02637102 completednot on this map

The UK CArdiac and Vascular Surgery Interventional Anaemia Response Study: An Observational Cohort Study to Determine the Impact and Effect of Anaemia in Patients Awaiting Vascular and Cardiac Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2015 to 2019Enrolled425ConditionsIron Deficiency, Cardiac Patients, Anaemia, Vascular PatientsArmsNot applicable - observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marisa ChauDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK m.chau@ucl.ac.uk.
Toby RichardsDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Caroline EvansCardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Anna ButcherDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Timothy CollierDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andrew KleinDepartment of Anaesthesia, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/104/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreoperative anaemia is linked to poor postsurgical outcome, longer hospital stays, greater risk of complications and mortality. Currently in the UK, some sites have developed anaemia clinics or pathways that use intravenous iron to correct iron deficiency anaemia prior to surgery as their standard of care. Although intravenous iron has been observed to be effective in a variety of patient settings, there is insufficient evidence in its use in cardiac and vascular patients. The aim of this study is to observe the impact and effect of anaemia and its management in patients undergoing cardiac and vascular surgery. In addition, the UK Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Interventional Anaemia Response (CAVIAR) Study is also a feasibility study with the aim to establish anaemia management pathways in the preoperative setting to inform the design of future randomised controlled trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The UK CAVIAR Study is a multicentre, stepped, observational study, in patients awaiting major cardiac or vascular surgery. We will be examining different haematological variables (especially hepcidin), functional capacity and patient outcome. Patients will be compared based on their anaemia status, whether they received intravenous iron in accordance to their hospital's preoperative pathway, and their disease group. The primary outcomes are the change in haemoglobin levels from baseline (before treatment) to before surgery; and the number of successful patients recruited and consented (feasibility). The secondary outcomes will include changes in biomarkers of iron deficiency, length of stay, quality of life and postoperative recovery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the London-Westminster Research Ethics Committee (15/LO/1569, 27 November 2015). NHS approval was also obtained with each hospital trust. The findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials registry (NCT02637102) and the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN55032357).

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresVascular Surgical ProceduresAdministration, IntravenousAnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBlood TransfusionExercise TestFerritinsHemoglobinsHepcidinsHumansIronPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareUnited KingdomWalk TestFerritinsHemoglobinsHepcidinsIronAnaemiacardiovascular surgeryiron deficiencyPatient blood managementpreoperative anaemia management

Identifiers

PMID28420664
PMCPMC5775454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.