Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420367›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2017

Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression.

Azucena Justicia, Matilde Elices, Ana Isabel Cebria, Diego J Palao, Jesús Gorosabel, Dolors Puigdemont, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, Andrea Gabilondo, Alvaro Iruin, Ulrich Hegerl and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02312583 (Efficacy the Online Program iFightDepression for the Treatment of Mild and Moderate Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02312583 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy the Online Program iFightDepression for the Treatment of Mild and Moderate Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorParc de Salut MarRan2015 to 2018Enrolled310ConditionsDepressionArmsPsychoeducational online information, iFightDepression online programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Azucena JusticiaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain. ajusticia@imim.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5950-9528
Matilde ElicesCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Ana Isabel CebriaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Diego J PalaoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Jesús GorosabelCentro de Salud Lagasca, Madrid, Spain.
Dolors PuigdemontCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Javier de Diego-AdeliñoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Andrea GabilondoOutpatient Mental Health Care Network, Osakidetza- Basque Health System, Biodonosti Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Alvaro IruinOutpatient Mental Health Care Network, Osakidetza- Basque Health System, Biodonosti Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Ulrich HegerlUniversity Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Víctor PérezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last decade online interventions have emerged as a promising approach for patients with mild/moderate depressive symptoms, reaching at large populations and representing cost-effective alternatives. The main objective of this double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool (iFightDepression) for mild to moderate depression as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) versus internet-based psychoeducation plus TAU.

methodsA total of 310 participants with major depression disorder (MDD) will be recruited at four different mental-health facilities in Spain. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two study arms: iFightDepression (iFD) tool + TAU vs. internet-based psychoeducation + TAU. Both interventions last for 8 weeks and there is a 12 weeks follow up. The primary outcome measure is changes in depressive symptoms assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Additionally, pre-post interventions assessments will include socio-demographic data, a brief medical and clinical history and self-reported measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, functional impairments and satisfaction with the iFD tool. DISCUSSION: iFightDepression is an easy-prescribed tool that could increase the efficacy of conventional treatment and potentially reach untreated patients, shortening waiting lists to receive psychological treatment. Confirming the efficacy of the iFD internet-based self-management tool as an add-on treatment for individuals with mild to moderate depression will be clinically-relevant.

trial registrationRegistration number NCT02312583 . Clinicaltrials.gov . December 4, 2014.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInternetMajor Depressive DisorderMaleQuality of LifeSelf CareTreatment OutcomeCognitive behavioural therapyDepressionInternet-basedPrimary careRandomized controlled trialSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID28420367
PMCPMC5395842
OpenAlexW2605535830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.