Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420224›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Silk Fibroin-Alginate-Hydroxyapatite Composite Particles in Bone Tissue Engineering Applications In Vivo.

You-Young Jo, Seong-Gon Kim, Kwang-Jun Kwon, HaeYong Kweon, Weon-Sik Chae, Won-Geun Yang, Eun-Young Lee, Hyun Seok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Multiple ways for the same destination: bone regeneration.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Alginate and alginate composites for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

You-Young JoSericultural & Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Korea. yyjo@korea.kr.
Seong-Gon KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea. epker@chol.com.
Kwang-Jun KwonDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea. jf1225@gwnu.ac.kr.
HaeYong KweonSericultural & Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju 55365, Korea. hykweon@korea.kr.
Weon-Sik ChaeAnalysis Research Division, Daegu Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Daegu 41566, Korea. Wschae@kbsi.re.kr.
Won-Geun YangAnalysis Research Division, Daegu Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Daegu 41566, Korea. wgyang1@kbsi.re.kr.
Eun-Young LeeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ley926@chungbuk.ac.kr.
Hyun SeokDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea. sok8585@hanmail.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bone regeneration capability of alginate (AL), AL/hydroxyapatite (HA), and AL/HA/silk fibroin (SF) composites. Forty Sprague Dawley rats were used for the animal experiments. Central calvarial bone (diameter: 8.0 mm) defects were grafted with AL, AL/HA, or AL/HA/SF. New bone formation was evaluated by histomorphometric analysis. To demonstrate the immunocompatibility of each group, the level of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α expression was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) at eight weeks post implantation. Additionally, osteogenic markers, such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and Runt-related transcription factor (Runx2) were evaluated by qPCR or IHC at eight weeks post implantation. The AL/HA/SF group showed significantly higher new bone formation than did the control group (

Indexed as

AlginatesBone RegenerationDurapatiteFibroinsNanoparticlesTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCell SurvivalGene ExpressionGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsImmunohistochemistryOsteogenesisAlginatesBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersDurapatiteFibroinsGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsSilkTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaalginatehydroxyapatiteKeywords: silk fibrointumor necrosis factor α

Identifiers

PMID28420224
PMCPMC5412440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.