Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420154›Full record

ReviewViruses2017

Mechanisms of LTR-Retroelement Transposition: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster.

Lidia Nefedova, Alexander Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Domesticated LTR-RetrotransposonLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Spontaneous mutations in maize pollen are frequent in some lines and arise mainly from retrotranspositions and deletions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lidia NefedovaDepartment of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia. lidia_nefedova@mail.ru.
Alexander KimDepartment of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia. aikim57@mail.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons occupy a special place among all mobile genetic element families. The structure of LTR retrotransposons that have three open reading frames is identical to DNA forms of retroviruses that are integrated into the host genome. Several lines of evidence suggest that LTR retrotransposons share a common ancestry with retroviruses and thus are highly relevant to understanding mechanisms of transposition. Drosophila melanogaster is an exceptionally convenient model for studying the mechanisms of retrotransposon movement because many such elements in its genome are transpositionally active. Moreover, two LTRretrotransposons of D. melanogaster, gypsy and ZAM, have been found to have infectious properties and have been classified as errantiviruses. Despite numerous studies focusing on retroviral integration process, there is still no clear understanding of integration specificity in a target site. Most LTR retrotransposons non-specifically integrate into a target site. Site-specificity of integration at vertebrate retroviruses is rather relative. At the same time, sequence-specific integration is the exclusive property of errantiviruses and their derivatives with two open reading frames. The possible basis for the errantivirus integration specificity is discussed in the present review.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterRecombination, GeneticRetroviridaeTranscription, GeneticVirus IntegrationRetroelementsDrosophilaerrantivirusLTR‐retrotransposonretrovirustransposition

Identifiers

PMID28420154
PMCPMC5408687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.