Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28420116›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Construct Validity of an Obesity Risk Screening Tool in Two Age Groups.

Karissa L Peyer, Greg J Welk

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Home environment factors associated with child BMI changes during COVID-19 pandemic.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karissa L PeyerDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 518 Oak Street, Metro 105 Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA. Karissa-peyer@utc.edu.
Greg J WelkDepartment of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, 257 Forker Building, Ames, IA 50011, USA. gwelk@iastate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home environment influences child health, but the impact varies as children move into adolescence. The Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool has been used to evaluate home environments, but studies have not compared the utility of the tool in different age groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the FNPA tool in first and tenth grade samples. Parents of first grade (

Indexed as

Age FactorsBody Mass IndexAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMidwestern United StatesObesityRisk AssessmentSocial ClassFamily Nutrition and Physical Activity screening toolobesity risk factorssocioeconomic statusyouth and adolescence

Identifiers

PMID28420116
PMCPMC5409620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.