Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419650›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical practice2017

Cardiovascular safety in refractory incontinent patients with overactive bladder receiving add-on mirabegron therapy to solifenacin (BESIDE).

Marcus J Drake, Scott MacDiarmid, Christopher R Chapple, Adil Esen, Stavros Athanasiou, Javier Cambronero Santos, David Mitcheson, Sender Herschorn, Emad Siddiqui, Moses Huang and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Marcus J DrakeUniversity of Bristol and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK.
Scott MacDiarmidAlliance Urology Specialists, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Christopher R ChappleRoyal Hallamshire Hospital and Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Adil EsenDokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Stavros AthanasiouUniversity of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Javier Cambronero SantosInfanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
David MitchesonSt Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA, USA.
Sender HerschornSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Emad SiddiquiAstellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, Surrey, UK.
Moses HuangAstellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, Surrey, UK.
Matthias StoelzelAstellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Astellas Pharma (Germany) · DEAstellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLAthens Medical Center · GRCarolina Veterinary Specialists · USDokuz Eylül University · TRHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESSheffield Hallam University · GBSt. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

objectivesIn the BESIDE study, combination therapy (antimuscarinic [solifenacin] and β

methodsOAB patients remaining incontinent despite daily solifenacin 5 mg during 4-week single-blind run-in, were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination (solifenacin 5 mg/mirabegron 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg after week 4), solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 weeks. CV safety assessments included frequency of CV-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), change from baseline in vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse rate) and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters.

resultsThe frequency of hypertension, tachycardia and ECG QT prolongation, respectively, was low and comparable across combination (1.1%, 0.3%, 0.1%), solifenacin 5 mg (0.7%, 0.1%, 0.1%), and solifenacin 10 mg groups (0.8%, 0%, 0.1%). Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in SBP, DBP, and pulse rate with combination (0.07 mm Hg [0.38], -0.35 mm Hg [0.26], 0.47 bpm [0.28]), solifenacin 5 mg (-0.93 mm Hg [0.38], -0.45 mm Hg [0.26], 0.43 bpm [0.28]) and solifenacin 10 mg (-1.28 mm Hg [0.38], -0.48 mm Hg [0.26], 0.27 bpm [0.28]) was generally comparable, with the exception of a mean treatment difference of ~1 mm Hg in SBP between combination and solifenacin monotherapy; SBP was unchanged with combination and decreased with solifenacin monotherapy. Mean changes from baseline to EoT in ECG parameters were generally similar across treatment groups, except for QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula, which was higher with solifenacin 10 mg (3.30 mseconds) vs. combination (0.49 mseconds) and solifenacin 5 mg (0.77 mseconds).

conclusionThe comparable frequency of CV-related TEAEs, changes in vital signs and ECG parameters indicates no synergistic effect on CV safety outcomes when mirabegron and solifenacin are combined.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAdrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsSingle-Blind MethodAcetanilidesAdrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsmirabegronMuscarinic AntagonistsSolifenacin SuccinateThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID28419650
PMCPMC5485167
OpenAlexW2607127088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.