Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419415›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Allostery at opioid receptors: modulation with small molecule ligands.

Kathryn E Livingston, John R Traynor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Opioid Receptors and Protonation-Coupled Binding of Opioid Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn E LivingstonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8652-4045
John R TraynorDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-8316
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Allosteric Modulation of the Mu-Opioid ReceptorR37DA039997 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 2015 to 2024
$6.4M
Medical marijuana: Longitudinal trajectories in use, pain and functioningR01DA033397 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ILGEN, MARK A. · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033397NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA039997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid receptors are 7-transmembrane domain receptors that couple to heterotrimeric G proteins. The endogenous ligands for opioid receptors are peptides which bind to the orthosteric site on the receptors. The μ-opioid receptor is the target for opioid analgesics, while the δ-opioid receptor has been suggested as a target for pain management, migraine and depression. Similarly, κ-opioid receptors are involved in pain and depression and nociceptin receptors in pain and mood behaviours. However, exogenous orthosteric ligands for opioid receptors cause a myriad of on-target side effects. Recently, selective allosteric ligands for μ- and δ-opioid receptors have been described. These compounds bind to a site on the receptor distinct from the orthosteric site. Occupation of this allosteric site leads to modulation of orthosteric ligand binding affinity and/or efficacy. Allosteric modulators may be positive, negative or silent (neutral) (PAMs, NAMs or SAMs respectively). PAMs may have in vivo activity by enhancing the activity of exogenous drugs or endogenous opioid peptides. Enhancing endogenous opioid peptide activity maintains the temporal and spatial distribution of these molecules but improves, and potentially qualitatively changes, activity at their cognate receptors which could limit side effects compared with traditional opioid drugs. In this review, we describe the rationale and promise for the development of allosteric modulators for opioid receptors, the discovery of selective allosteric modulators, the identification of potential allosteric sites on opioid receptors and the mode of action of the modulators. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Areas of Opioid Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.14/issuetoc.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteAnimalsLigandsReceptors, OpioidLigandsReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID28419415
PMCPMC6016636
OpenAlexW2606908569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.