Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419261›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Challenges in adapting existing clinical natural language processing systems to multiple, diverse health care settings.

David S Carrell, Robert E Schoen, Daniel A Leffler, Michele Morris, Sherri Rose, Andrew Baer, Seth D Crockett, Rebecca A Gourevitch, Katie M Dean, Ateev Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficient extraction of medication information from clinical notes: an evaluation in 2 languages.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David S CarrellKaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert E SchoenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel A LefflerDivision of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Michele MorrisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sherri RoseDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew BaerKaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute (formerly Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Seth D CrockettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rebecca A GourevitchDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katie M DeanDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)KL2TR001109 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$5.7M
Measuring and Improving Colonoscopy Quality Using Natural Language ProcessingR01CA168959 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MEHROTRA, ATEEV · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001109NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWidespread application of clinical natural language processing (NLP) systems requires taking existing NLP systems and adapting them to diverse and heterogeneous settings. We describe the challenges faced and lessons learned in adapting an existing NLP system for measuring colonoscopy quality. MATERIALS AND

methodsColonoscopy and pathology reports from 4 settings during 2013-2015, varying by geographic location, practice type, compensation structure, and electronic health record.

resultsThough successful, adaptation required considerably more time and effort than anticipated. Typical NLP challenges in assembling corpora, diverse report structures, and idiosyncratic linguistic content were greatly magnified. DISCUSSION: Strategies for addressing adaptation challenges include assessing site-specific diversity, setting realistic timelines, leveraging local electronic health record expertise, and undertaking extensive iterative development. More research is needed on how to make it easier to adapt NLP systems to new clinical settings.

conclusionsA key challenge in widespread application of NLP is adapting existing systems to new clinical settings.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingData CollectionHumansInformation DisseminationMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPathology, Clinicalcancer screeningdata collectionelectronic health recordsinformation disseminationnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID28419261
PMCPMC6080843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.