Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28419183›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2017

Comparison of the Mutational Profiles of Primary Myelofibrosis, Polycythemia Vera, and Essential Thrombocytosis.

Jinming Song, Mohammad Hussaini, Hailing Zhang, Haipeng Shao, Dahui Qin, Xiaohui Zhang, Zhenjun Ma, Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi, Ling Zhang, Lynn C Moscinski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Pathogenesis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Prevalence ofCancers · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinming SongDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Mohammad HussainiDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Hailing ZhangDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Haipeng ShaoDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Dahui QinDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Xiaohui ZhangDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Zhenjun MaBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain NaqviBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Ling ZhangDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Lynn C MoscinskiDepartments of Hematopathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the mutational profiles of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocytosis (ET).

methodsNext-generation sequencing results of 75 cases of PMF, 33 cases of PV, and 27 cases of ET were compared.

resultsMutation rates of ASXL1 and SRSF2 were significantly higher in PMF than in PV or ET. ASXL1 mutations appeared to be more frequently associated with risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia than JAK2 or TET2 mutations. The most common mutation-cytogenetic combinations in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) were mutations of JAK2 or ASXL1 with del(20q) and were more common in patients with PMF and PV than in patients with ET. Differences were also found between patients with PMF and PV.

conclusionsPMF, PV, and ET show different mutational profiles, which may be helpful in resolving the differential diagnosis between MPNs. Due to the relatively small number of cases and variable testing over time, larger controlled studies are necessary to confirm the findings.

Indexed as

AgedDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutation RatePolycythemia VeraPrimary MyelofibrosisThrombocythemia, EssentialETGeneticsMolecularMPNMutationMyelofibrosisPMFProfilePV

Identifiers

PMID28419183
PMCPMC5402718
OpenAlexW2606912628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.